2005
DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2005.95.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Genotypical Differences for Leaf Characteristics in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, calculating the leaf size as LA over leaf number, Black eye bean leaf size exceeded that of the small leaf producing variety-White wonderer trailing by 39%. In agreement with this result, Pereira et al (2019), Peksen et al (2005) and Bisikiwa et al (2014) reported a difference in leaf growth among cowpea varieties including leaf number and area. The improved LAI observed for the Black eye bean variety could be associated with its higher LA and the strong positive (r ¼ 0.99, p ¼ 0.001) correlation between LA and LAI (Table 5).…”
Section: Varietal Effect On Plant Development and Photosynthesissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For instance, calculating the leaf size as LA over leaf number, Black eye bean leaf size exceeded that of the small leaf producing variety-White wonderer trailing by 39%. In agreement with this result, Pereira et al (2019), Peksen et al (2005) and Bisikiwa et al (2014) reported a difference in leaf growth among cowpea varieties including leaf number and area. The improved LAI observed for the Black eye bean variety could be associated with its higher LA and the strong positive (r ¼ 0.99, p ¼ 0.001) correlation between LA and LAI (Table 5).…”
Section: Varietal Effect On Plant Development and Photosynthesissupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Similar findings were reported by Sharawy and El-Fiky (2002), Dhanassekar and Pandev (2005), Sheela and Gopalan (2006) in cowpea genotypes for NLP, LA, leaf/stem ratio and leaf crude protein content. Analyzing local cowpea genotypes in Turkey, Peksen et al (2005) observed in contrast that there was no statistically difference in terms of leaf area.…”
Section: Genotypic Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The leaflet length and width were recorded in centimetre. Trifoliate leaf area (LA) was determined as (Peksen et al, 2005):…”
Section: Data Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leaf area was determined according to Erkut et al [24] using this formula: SF = 0.67* (L1*W1) + (L2*W2) + (L3*W3), where SF = leaf area; L1 = length of leaf blade 1; L2 = length of leaf blade 2; L3 = length of leaf blade 3; W1 = maximum width of leaf blade 1; W2 = maximum leaf blade width 2 and W3 = maximum leaf blade width 3. Maximum leaflet width (W) (at the widest point perpendicular to the midrib) and length (L) (from lamina tip to the point of petiole intersection along them).…”
Section: Studied Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the nutritional importance of this plant, it is, therefore, necessary to solve the fertility problem of Adamawa soils, to improve the P. vulgaris productivity. Adamawa farmers most often use chemical fertilizers for common bean cultivation [6][7][8][9]. However, the use of chemical fertilizers presents an immediate beneficial effect on crop growth and provides an immediate solution to solve fertility problems, but their high cost and unavailability make them almost inaccessible to small farmers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%