2014
DOI: 10.5721/eujrs20144734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of green aboveground biomass in desert steppe using litter-soil-adjusted vegetation index

Abstract: Accurate estimation of green aboveground biomass in arid and semiarid grassland is essential for a variety of studies, such as sustainable grassland management, fire risk assessment, climate change, and environmental degradation. A great need exists for the establishment of robust method for estimating green aboveground biomass in arid and semiarid grassland due to the influences of soil background and litter. In the study, a new index (litter-soil-adjusted vegetation index, L-SAVI) was proposed to estimate gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with Brinkmann et al () who modelled the aboveground net primary production of vegetation under arid and semi‐arid climatic conditions, and Prabhakara, Hively, and McCarty () who modelled the biomass of winter cover crops. However, this does not mean that the SAVI and MSAVI perform less well than the NDVI, as they appear to perform better in other environmental conditions (Magiera, Feilhauer, Waldhardt, Wiesmair, & Otte, ; Ren & Zhou, ). Nevertheless, all VI models designed to predict ephemeral plant biomass gave unsatisfactory results in that the r 2 is close to zero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results are consistent with Brinkmann et al () who modelled the aboveground net primary production of vegetation under arid and semi‐arid climatic conditions, and Prabhakara, Hively, and McCarty () who modelled the biomass of winter cover crops. However, this does not mean that the SAVI and MSAVI perform less well than the NDVI, as they appear to perform better in other environmental conditions (Magiera, Feilhauer, Waldhardt, Wiesmair, & Otte, ; Ren & Zhou, ). Nevertheless, all VI models designed to predict ephemeral plant biomass gave unsatisfactory results in that the r 2 is close to zero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At present, several vegetation indices are used to estimate aboveground biomass, including NDVI, RVI, DVI, EVI, GNDVI, and SAVI [48]. As SAVI is very sensitive to soil background changes [19], this index is suitable for monitoring grasslands with relatively sparse vegetation, such as the Mongolian Plateau [48,49].…”
Section: Correlation Between Total Aboveground Biomass and Savi In Qumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their flexibility, it is also possible to analyse the above-ground biomass variation within different regions or in time, as well as the impact of disturbances, such as deforestation or fire (Potter, 1999). IKONOS, WorldView-2 and QuickBird images, with high spatial resolution, have been used to study biomass in oil palm plantations in Africa (Thenkabail et al, 2004); tree parameters in Amazon forest (Palace, Keller, Asner, Hagen, & Braswell, 2008); structural parameters in Pinus forest in Central Spain (Gómez, Wulder, Montes, & Delgado, 2012); biomass in highdensity biomass wetlands vegetation (Mutanga, Adam, & Cho, 2012); forest attributes and above-ground biomass in boreal forest stands in Canada (Mora, Wulder, White, & Hobart, 2013); above-ground biomass in mangrove forests in Thailand (Hirata et al, 2014) and in desert steppe ecosystems in Mongolia (Ren & Zhou, 2014); and forest biomass in Chile and Germany (Maack et al, 2015). Using GeoEye-1 and Pleiades-1A images, Clerici, Rubiano, Abd-Elrahman, Hoestettler, and Escobedo (2016) developed a methodology to estimate above-ground biomass in a complex forest in the Colombian Andes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%