2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-9792-0_104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of hardening behaviour and contact friction of sheet metal in a multi-layered upsetting test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to now, some efforts have been done on rheological behavior and interfacial friction against specific friction phenomenon, and a large number of studies have been carried out in sheet [3][4][5][6][7] and bulk [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] metal forming to evaluate the rheological behavior and interfacial friction. Some parameter estimation approaches, such as direct method and inverse method [16,17], were developed to analyze rheological behavior and interfacial friction; meanwhile, many test methods, such as forward extrusion [18], forward-backward extrusion [19], ring upsetting [20][21][22], cylinder upsetting [23,24], multi-layered upsetting test [3], double-cup extrusion [25][26][27], upsetting-sliding [28], backward extrusion [29], and T-shape compression test [30], were presented to analyze rheological behavior and interfacial friction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Up to now, some efforts have been done on rheological behavior and interfacial friction against specific friction phenomenon, and a large number of studies have been carried out in sheet [3][4][5][6][7] and bulk [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] metal forming to evaluate the rheological behavior and interfacial friction. Some parameter estimation approaches, such as direct method and inverse method [16,17], were developed to analyze rheological behavior and interfacial friction; meanwhile, many test methods, such as forward extrusion [18], forward-backward extrusion [19], ring upsetting [20][21][22], cylinder upsetting [23,24], multi-layered upsetting test [3], double-cup extrusion [25][26][27], upsetting-sliding [28], backward extrusion [29], and T-shape compression test [30], were presented to analyze rheological behavior and interfacial friction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some parameter estimation approaches, such as direct method and inverse method [16,17], were developed to analyze rheological behavior and interfacial friction; meanwhile, many test methods, such as forward extrusion [18], forward-backward extrusion [19], ring upsetting [20][21][22], cylinder upsetting [23,24], multi-layered upsetting test [3], double-cup extrusion [25][26][27], upsetting-sliding [28], backward extrusion [29], and T-shape compression test [30], were presented to analyze rheological behavior and interfacial friction. Of all the test methods, ring and cylinder upsetting test easily applied is the most well-known test method widely so far [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%