2018
DOI: 10.5937/jaes16-18981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of heavy machines performances by using a measuring system with telemetric synchronization and transmission of signals

Abstract: This paper presents the investigation of importancefor determining the dynamic structural response of heavy lifting machines subjected to extreme external effects. A measuring system for the experimental investigation of the dynamics of heavy lifting machines is proposed.It shows the experimental testing results of carrying structures for several classes of hoisting and an export mining machine. The results refer to the most important dynamic parameters. The dynamic parameters also include the duration of tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where u 1 is the fluid filtration rate near the well wall with a radius r, m/s;  2 is the fluid filtration rate in the BHFZ at a distance R from the well, m/s; R is the radius of squeezing (based on the experience of preventing scaling via the technique of injecting the inhibitor in the BHFZ, to achieve good results, it is sufficient to squeeze the inhibitor solution 1-2 m deep into the formation) (Antipin et al, 1987; Lyushin et al, 1983;Radoičić and Jovanović, 2018); h is an opened effective formation thickness, m; since R>>r, then R -r ≈ R.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where u 1 is the fluid filtration rate near the well wall with a radius r, m/s;  2 is the fluid filtration rate in the BHFZ at a distance R from the well, m/s; R is the radius of squeezing (based on the experience of preventing scaling via the technique of injecting the inhibitor in the BHFZ, to achieve good results, it is sufficient to squeeze the inhibitor solution 1-2 m deep into the formation) (Antipin et al, 1987; Lyushin et al, 1983;Radoičić and Jovanović, 2018); h is an opened effective formation thickness, m; since R>>r, then R -r ≈ R.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%