2013
DOI: 10.1021/ac400256x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Heterogeneous Electron Transfer and Homogeneous Comproportionation Rate Constants of Tetracyanoquinodimethane Using Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy

Abstract: We report the use of scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM) in determining the heterogeneous electron transfer and homogeneous comproportionation kinetics of tetracyanoquinodimethane (TCNQ) in acetonitrile at Pt tip UMEs (radius 12.5–1 μm). TCNQ undergoes two consecutive one-electron reductions with comproportionation occurring between TCNQ2–, the product of the second reduction, and bulk TCNQ to produce TCNQ–. A standard rate constant, k(1)(0) = 2.9 ± 0.5 cm/s, for the first reduction was determined by ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diffusion coefficients ( D ) of TCNQF and TCNQF 2 found by analysis of the scan rate dependence of 1.0 mM concentrations and use of Equation (7) were 2.15±0.13×10 −5 and 2.10±0.17×10 −5 cm s −1 , respectively. These D values are similar to those of TCNQF 4 (2.0×10 −5 cm s −1 ) and TCNQ (1.9×10 −5 cm s −1 ) ,. Similarly, D (TCNQF 1− , TCNQF 2 1− )=1.9×10 −5 cm 2 s −1 , D (TCNQF 2− , TCNQF 2 2− )=1.5×10 −5 cm 2 s −1 , D (TCNQF)=2.15×10 −5 cm 2 s −1 were determined from 1.0 mM solutions, prepared by bulk electrolysis of the neutral species (see Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The diffusion coefficients ( D ) of TCNQF and TCNQF 2 found by analysis of the scan rate dependence of 1.0 mM concentrations and use of Equation (7) were 2.15±0.13×10 −5 and 2.10±0.17×10 −5 cm s −1 , respectively. These D values are similar to those of TCNQF 4 (2.0×10 −5 cm s −1 ) and TCNQ (1.9×10 −5 cm s −1 ) ,. Similarly, D (TCNQF 1− , TCNQF 2 1− )=1.9×10 −5 cm 2 s −1 , D (TCNQF 2− , TCNQF 2 2− )=1.5×10 −5 cm 2 s −1 , D (TCNQF)=2.15×10 −5 cm 2 s −1 were determined from 1.0 mM solutions, prepared by bulk electrolysis of the neutral species (see Figure ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is a significant advantage in measuring kinetics, even for rapid processes, under conditions where double-layer charging and adsorption do not contribute to the observed currents. 64,65 However, transient measurements are also possible where the tip current, i T , is recorded as a function of time. The transient mode is useful in the measurement of homogeneous kinetics, for systems that are changing with time, and for determining the diffusion coefficient of a species without needing to know the solution concentration or number of electrons transferred in the electrode reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of a heterogeneous substrate reaction was also attempted (data not shown); however, since the optimized homogeneous reaction rate was high (based on i inf ), any heterogeneous rate employed either produced a negative or positive feedback response, in good agreement with SECM theory for coupled homo/heterogeneous reactions. 35,36,38,42,48 2.4.2. Reactivity from the Envelope of the Oscillations.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SECM has been used extensively for interrogating the reactivity of chemical species in solution, at a substrate, 3,4,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] as well as for characterizing short-lived radical species. 37,[39][40][41]43 Therefore, from both geometric and mechanistic aspects, SECM is ideal to interrogate oscillating chemical reactions in confined conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%