2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of hexoestrol residues in animal tissues based on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and comparison with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DES was able to compete with the coating antigen to interact with the antibody in the range of 50-1350 pg mL -1 , and in this range the absorbance value exhibited a good linear relationship with a logarithmic DES concentration (R 2 = 0.993; Figure 5). Based on the preparation of the polyclonal antibody against DES, Xu et al [16,17] established a direct ELISA method for DES detection. A DES-HRP conjugate was required to perform the direct ELISA assay.…”
Section: Antibody Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DES was able to compete with the coating antigen to interact with the antibody in the range of 50-1350 pg mL -1 , and in this range the absorbance value exhibited a good linear relationship with a logarithmic DES concentration (R 2 = 0.993; Figure 5). Based on the preparation of the polyclonal antibody against DES, Xu et al [16,17] established a direct ELISA method for DES detection. A DES-HRP conjugate was required to perform the direct ELISA assay.…”
Section: Antibody Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [14,15] produced two kinds of similar polyclonal antibodies against DES with IC 50 of 1.02 and 1.89 μg L -1 , respectively. Xu et al [16,17] also prepared a polyclonal antibody against DES with an average IC 50 value of 2.4 ng mL -1 , a calibration range of 0.2-30.5 ng mL -1 , and a detection limit of 0.07 ng mL -1 . Compared with the polyclonal antibody, the application of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) was advantageous in terms of purity, sensitivity and specificity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods require extensive sample preparation, expensive instruments and professional operation. Alternatively, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been successfully developed for screening HES in urine or tissues [15,16], but, ELISA also needs incubation and washing steps and is mainly confined to laboratories. Since the development of the lateral flow immunochromatographic strip test (LFIST) for on-site detection of the concentrations of biotech crops in samples of ground grain [17], it has become a more popular method for the qualitative or semi-quantitative detection of various analytes [18][19][20][21][22] for its advantages of a one-step process (only addition of specimen), rapidity (less than 5 min) and costeffectiveness [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common techniques used to detect defective foods are liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nevertheless, these methods are not suitable for on-site analysis (Wang et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2006); moreover, they are expensive and require more skilled personnel to operate them. Therefore, rapid, sensitive, inexpensive and accurate simple and time-saving methods such as Lateral immunochromatographic strips and indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ic-ELISA), which require less knowledge for operation, must be developed complementary to conventional instrumental techniques Tochi et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%