2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-008-0330-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of holomorphic modular forms by primitive Fourier coefficients

Abstract: We prove that Siegel modular forms of degree greater than one, integral weight and level N , with respect to a Dirichlet character χ of conductor f χ are uniquely determined by their Fourier coefficients indexed by matrices whose contents run over all divisors of N /f χ . The cases of other major types of holomorphic modular forms are included.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a first result in this direction, it was shown by D. Zagier [22] that the Siegel cusp forms of degree 2 are determined by primitive Fourier coefficients. This has been generalized to Siegel and Hermitian cusp forms with levels and of higher degrees by S. Yamana [21]. Similar results along this line, essentially distinguishing Siegel Hecke eigenforms of degree 2 by the so-called 'radial' Fourier coefficients (i.e., by certain subset of matrices of the form mT with T half-integral, m ≥ 1), has been obtained in Breulmann-Kohnen [2], Scharlau-Walling [18], Katsurada [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…As a first result in this direction, it was shown by D. Zagier [22] that the Siegel cusp forms of degree 2 are determined by primitive Fourier coefficients. This has been generalized to Siegel and Hermitian cusp forms with levels and of higher degrees by S. Yamana [21]. Similar results along this line, essentially distinguishing Siegel Hecke eigenforms of degree 2 by the so-called 'radial' Fourier coefficients (i.e., by certain subset of matrices of the form mT with T half-integral, m ≥ 1), has been obtained in Breulmann-Kohnen [2], Scharlau-Walling [18], Katsurada [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Consider a function G − I(φ), which belongs to S κ (Γ ϕ ) by Corollary 8.2. Since it has vanishing primitive Fourier coefficients by (ii), Theorem 3 of [36] concludes that…”
Section: Remark 84mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The statement below seems to be new only when we start from a vector-valued function. In the scalar-valued case variants have appeared in works of Eichler-Zagier [15], Yamana [41], Ibukiyama [18] and others.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in this part should hold more generally over the classical tube domains I-IV (as in e.g. [41]), but we do not pursue it here mainly because such a treatment may obscure the technical points of the paper. We may return to this point in a future work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%