2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2011.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of instantaneous breaking rate by Geological Strength Index, Block Punch Index and power of impact hammer for various rock mass conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only that, in sites where the rock is highly weathered, the rocks are harder to prepare as the rock would crumble, resulting in failure to comply with the testing standard size as per ASTM and ISRM Standards. In order to overcome this, Engineers often utilize indirect testing methods to obtain rock strength parameters as they are simpler, cheaper, quicker and easily adaptable to the field [5][6]. One of the popular indirect methods used for this purpose is the Point Load Test (PLT).…”
Section: Problem Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only that, in sites where the rock is highly weathered, the rocks are harder to prepare as the rock would crumble, resulting in failure to comply with the testing standard size as per ASTM and ISRM Standards. In order to overcome this, Engineers often utilize indirect testing methods to obtain rock strength parameters as they are simpler, cheaper, quicker and easily adaptable to the field [5][6]. One of the popular indirect methods used for this purpose is the Point Load Test (PLT).…”
Section: Problem Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For rock engineering design, it is important to have a reasonable determination of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The traditional experiments of UCS have some disadvantages, e.g., these are time consuming, expensive, resulting in only a limited number of UCS assessments being carried out [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional tests for UCS, however, have some shortcomings in that they are time-consuming and expensive and use restricted sampling. In addition, it may be difficult to conduct sampling and sample preparations for weak rocks [6,7]. Therefore, an alternative method is needed to provide a better estimation of UCS of rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%