2013
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.113.052134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Intracellular Unbound Concentrations and Subcellular Localization of Drugs in Rat Sandwich-Cultured Hepatocytes Compared with Liver Tissue

Abstract: Prediction of clinical efficacy, toxicity, and drug-drug interactions may be improved by accounting for the intracellular unbound drug concentration (C unbound ) in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, subcellular drug distribution may aid in predicting efficacy, toxicity, and risk assessment. The present study was designed to quantify the intracellular C unbound and subcellular localization of drugs in rat sandwich-cultured hepatocytes (SCH) compared with rat isolated perfused liver (IPL) tissue. Probe drugs with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
57
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that quantification of intracellular concentration of a drug is, in general, a difficult task. It is well known that nonspecific binding is present in many hepatocyte incubations (Witherow and Houston, 1999;Austin et al, 2005;Lu et al, 2006;Chu et al, 2013;Pfeifer et al, 2013). In addition, the presence of Matrigel in the SCH may hinder the total removal of extracellular TP, leading to an overestimation of intracellular concentrations.…”
Section: Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that quantification of intracellular concentration of a drug is, in general, a difficult task. It is well known that nonspecific binding is present in many hepatocyte incubations (Witherow and Houston, 1999;Austin et al, 2005;Lu et al, 2006;Chu et al, 2013;Pfeifer et al, 2013). In addition, the presence of Matrigel in the SCH may hinder the total removal of extracellular TP, leading to an overestimation of intracellular concentrations.…”
Section: Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, accurate model predictions of the experimental C out , total liver concentrations, and cumulative biliary ATV amounts increase confidence in the prediction of unbound intracellular concentrations in this study. Organelle binding of drugs to calculate unbound intracellular concentrations has been reported for ritonavir, rosuvastatin (Pfeifer et al, 2013), and metformin (Chien et al, 2016). The complex interplay between uptake, metabolism, and efflux and its effect on unbound intracellular concentrations can be addressed with a number of approaches (e.g., sandwich cultured hepatocytes) (Pfeifer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Intracellular Unbound Atorvastatin Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organelle binding of drugs to calculate unbound intracellular concentrations has been reported for ritonavir, rosuvastatin (Pfeifer et al, 2013), and metformin (Chien et al, 2016). The complex interplay between uptake, metabolism, and efflux and its effect on unbound intracellular concentrations can be addressed with a number of approaches (e.g., sandwich cultured hepatocytes) (Pfeifer et al, 2013). Our approach uses a simple compartmental model parameterized with complex experimental data from the liver perfusion studies.…”
Section: Intracellular Unbound Atorvastatin Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some high-throughput methods have been used to measure cellular total and unbound inhibitor concentrations ([I] t,cell and [I] u,cell , respectively) (Mateus et al, 2013). However, the isolation of cytosol and measurement of cytosolic total and unbound inhibitor concentrations ([I] t,cyt and [I] u,cyt , respectively) add complexity (Pfeifer et al, 2013b). Thus, [I] t,cyt or [I] u,cyt has not been adopted routinely into the prediction of efflux transporterbased drug interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%