1994
DOI: 10.1016/0584-8539(94)80004-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of ion association constants by means of IR absorption band intensities of the molecules forming the first coordination spheres of the cations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[64] Extensive concentration-dependent ion-pairing was also found for weak coordinating counterions, such as in LiBF 4 [30] and LiClO 4 , [62] by studying the CN vibration. [65] These findings for the coordination number are in good agreement with published X-ray structures. [66][67][68] However, Sajeevkumar and Singh found the average coordination number to be 4.7, [69] whereas Megyes et al found up to six acetonitrile molecules surrounding the Li + ion in the gas phase by means of mass spectrometry.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…[64] Extensive concentration-dependent ion-pairing was also found for weak coordinating counterions, such as in LiBF 4 [30] and LiClO 4 , [62] by studying the CN vibration. [65] These findings for the coordination number are in good agreement with published X-ray structures. [66][67][68] However, Sajeevkumar and Singh found the average coordination number to be 4.7, [69] whereas Megyes et al found up to six acetonitrile molecules surrounding the Li + ion in the gas phase by means of mass spectrometry.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…coordination seems to be the most stable at dilute concentrations, moving to Li(N)3.1(F)1.8 for the concentrated systems, and progressing to a much higher anion content, Li(N)1.9(F)2.5, for the highly concentrated electrolytes. The total coordination number, however, remains close to 4.5 for all cases, larger than the 4-fold coordination reported experimentally by different techniques [43,[46][47][48], suggesting the PM7 method to slightly overestimate the coordination number, the cut-off to be set to high, or possibly that the solvent exchange affects the experimental data. As noted above for both the ACN and the PC based electrolytes an increased salt concentration promotes a substitution of solvent molecules by anions in the first solvation shell, as expected [28].…”
Section: Cn and Cn Variancementioning
confidence: 52%
“…Hence, it seems that, to some extent, aspects of both the solvent insensitivity and solvent independence models must apply. Strong evidence supporting this conclusion comes also from studies of electrolytes dissolved in ACN, in which both “free” and “cation-bound” ACN molecules are similarly identified. , …”
Section: Rationalizing the Solvent Shift On The Basis Of The Solvent ...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…c Δ E is given as the raw energy, that as corrected for basis-set-superposition error (BSSE), and that with both BSSE and zero-point energy correction (ZPT). d Calculations for T d ACN 4 Li + , energies are per ACN, obs is for Li + in ACN …”
Section: Shaping a Quantitative Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation