2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(00)00487-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of iron and molybdenum in a dietetic preparation by flame AAS after dry ashing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The probable relative error ranged from 10.52% to 3.10% for concentrations of molybdenum(VI) from 20 to 200 ng/cm 3 . The results are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The probable relative error ranged from 10.52% to 3.10% for concentrations of molybdenum(VI) from 20 to 200 ng/cm 3 . The results are presented in Table 1.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To access the selectivity of the method, the influence of some foreign ions on the inhibited reaction rates was studied, under the optimal conditions mentioned above, at a constant molybdenum(VI) concentration of 200 ng/cm 3 . The results are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Interference Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several techniques such as inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), 2 atomic emission spectrometry (AES), [3][4][5][6] atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) [7][8][9][10][11] and chromatography [12][13][14] have been reported for the determination of iron and aluminum. However, the relatively high instrumental costs and the needs for preconcentration, chromatographic separation, extraction or coprecipitation are the common limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the methods of determining iron include spectrophotometry, ICP, chemiluminescence, fluorescence analysis, plasma mass spectrum, electrochemical analysis, GFAAS, 4 FAAS, 5 polarography, 4 and others. [6][7][8] Flame and graphite-furnace atomic absorption spectrometry 9,10 are the most commonly used techniques for the determination of iron. But these methods are disadvantageous in terms of cost and instruments used in routine analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%