2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012gl051630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of iron metal optical constants: Implications for ultraviolet, visible, and near‐infrared remote sensing of airless bodies

Abstract: [1] Iron metal is an opaque phase common in planetary materials both as an igneous mineral and as a spaceweathering by-product. In either form, iron metal has a large influence on the interpretation of ultraviolet, visible, and nearinfrared spectra of planetary surfaces obtained from Earth-or space-based observatories. Therefore, the optical properties of iron are a critical input necessary for accurate theoretical radiative-transfer mixing models for inversion of maturity and mineral proportions from reflecta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, metallic iron is relatively featureless in the NIR, with no prominent absorption features that could reveal its presence in a surficial mixture (Cahill et al, 2012;Cloutis et al, 1990Cloutis et al, , 2010. Furthermore, metallic iron is one of the mineral species, along with ilmenite, unlikely to be directly accounted for in Clementine spectral reflectance (CSR) NIR iron-determination methods due to the positioning of the wavelength bands employed by these algorithms (i.e., 750 and 950 nm; Blewett et al, 1997;Fischer and Pieters, 1994;Lawrence et al, 2002;Le Mouélic et al, 2000;Lucey et al, 1998Lucey et al, , 2000Lucey et al, , 1995Wilcox et al, 2005).…”
Section: O M / L O C a T E / I C A R U Smentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, metallic iron is relatively featureless in the NIR, with no prominent absorption features that could reveal its presence in a surficial mixture (Cahill et al, 2012;Cloutis et al, 1990Cloutis et al, , 2010. Furthermore, metallic iron is one of the mineral species, along with ilmenite, unlikely to be directly accounted for in Clementine spectral reflectance (CSR) NIR iron-determination methods due to the positioning of the wavelength bands employed by these algorithms (i.e., 750 and 950 nm; Blewett et al, 1997;Fischer and Pieters, 1994;Lawrence et al, 2002;Le Mouélic et al, 2000;Lucey et al, 1998Lucey et al, , 2000Lucey et al, , 1995Wilcox et al, 2005).…”
Section: O M / L O C a T E / I C A R U Smentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To demonstrate how spectral reflectance varies with metallic iron abundance we performed a test with radiative transfer theory (Hapke, 1993(Hapke, , 2001(Hapke, , 2012Lucey and Riner, 2011) using the optical constants of orthopyroxene (Trang et al, 2013), metallic iron (Cahill et al, 2012), and plagioclase (Lucey, 2002), respectively. The spectrum of a noritic anorthosite assemblage (75 vol.% plagioclase; 25 vol.% orthopyroxene; Mg' of 75) was modeled and then the assemblage was modified in two ways.…”
Section: O M / L O C a T E / I C A R U Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is the most abundant mineral in the sample, we use the real index of refraction and density of cronstedtite as input into the model for the Fe-rich assemblage. The optical constants used in our models are derived from Cahill et al (2012) for iron and Rouleau & Martin (1991) for the amorphous carbon.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we restrict the particle size of the hematite end-member to be between 1 and 10 μm for the fine hematite scenario. We also test a third scenario assuming nanophase hematite (<1 μm) embedded in the top tens to hundreds of nanometers of layer of surface grains [( 52 ) and references therein] by updating the absorption coefficient (α) in Eq. 1 ( 2 ) where n h , k h , and ρ h are refraction indices, absorption coefficients, and densities of host materials, respectively; similarly, n Hm , k Hm , and ρ Hm are refraction indices, absorption coefficients, and densities of hematite, respectively; λ is wavelength; M Hm is the mass fraction of hematite; z is expressed as …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%