Determination of Key Drivers of Patient Experience in a Midsize Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Ambulatory Clinic

Abstract

Background: Patient perception of care is positively associated with better medical outcomes, clinician job satisfaction, and fewer malpractice claims and also has significant downstream economic impact for healthcare organizations. A sparse amount of data exists regarding provider and practice characteristics driving high levels of patient experience in the pediatric hematology-oncology (PHO) ambulatory setting. The aims of this study were to determine key drivers of high care provider ratings and of the likelihood of recommending our ambulatory PHO practice. Methods: Patient experience was measured using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS). The study outcomes were to determine the survey items most associated with top-box scores for "Rate This Provider" and for "Likelihood of Your Recommending Our Practice to Others." Results: The survey items Explanations the care provider gave you about your problem or condition and Concern the care provider showed for your questions or worries were most strongly correlated with high provider ratings. How well the staff worked together to care for you and Friendliness/courtesy of nurse/assistant were most strongly correlated with the likelihood of recommending the practice. Conclusion: High provider ratings were most associated with the physician's ability to explain problems and conditions to families. Staff teamwork and nursing attitude were most associated with patient recommendations of the PHO practice. By identifying key drivers of high provider and practice ratings by patients in the PHO ambulatory setting, a targeted approach with a focus on physician-specific communication attributes, teamwork, and nursing attitude can be deployed to improve the patient experience.

Differences in Demographics of Vaccinees, Access to, and Satisfaction with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Procedures between German General Practices and Mass Vaccination Centers

“…Interestingly, demographics, inconveniences such as travel distance or wait time at site, or the perception of the post-vaccination waiting period had no significant influences on recommendation. Although time spent in the waiting room has been found to decrease the likelihood that patients would recommend a practice or care provider [46], other studies did not find this relationship [47,48], indicating that time is not the most influencing factor for recommendation. Indeed, shared decision-making, the physician-patient relationship, as well as easy-to-understand communication were strongly associated with the willingness to recommend the practice or care provider [49][50][51].…”

Impact of Telephone Follow-Up on Patient Satisfaction in a Pediatric Neurosurgery Clinic

“…Although the CG-CAHPS child visit survey is one of the most commonly utilized survey for outpatient pediatric usage, the psychometric properties of this tool are delineated for the adult version only ( 8 ). The CG-CAHPS survey, which is applicable to both adult and pediatric patients, is standardized and validated ( 3 , 9 ). The CAHPS survey is available for any organization to use once the survey has been released into the public domain by AHRQ ( 10 ).…”