2017
DOI: 10.3390/en10101575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Klinkenberg Permeability Conditioned to Pore-Throat Structures in Tight Formations

Abstract: This paper has developed a pragmatic technique to efficiently and accurately determine the Klinkenberg permeability for tight formations with different pore-throat structures. Firstly, the authors use steady-state experiments to measure the Klinkenberg permeability of 56 tight core samples under different mean pore pressures and confining pressures. Secondly, pressure-controlled mercury injection (PMI) experiments and thin-section analyses are conducted to differentiate pore-throat structures. After considerin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the previous findings associated with the Klinkenberg permeability and the slippage factor, the Klinkenberg permeability has been found to be linearly related to the under the aforementioned three experimental conditions, which shares similarity with the Klinkenberg permeability measured in tight oil formations [23]. Figure 5 shows the relationships between * and Klinkenberg permeability of samples 1-12 and samples 1-8 under high confining pressure condition, respectively.…”
Section: New Correlationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Besides the previous findings associated with the Klinkenberg permeability and the slippage factor, the Klinkenberg permeability has been found to be linearly related to the under the aforementioned three experimental conditions, which shares similarity with the Klinkenberg permeability measured in tight oil formations [23]. Figure 5 shows the relationships between * and Klinkenberg permeability of samples 1-12 and samples 1-8 under high confining pressure condition, respectively.…”
Section: New Correlationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) is also a technique of determining the porosity of coal [31][32][33], where liquid mercury is gradually injected into pores of coal with the increase of pressure by overcoming the surface tension. The higher injection pressure, the smaller pores can be penetrated by mercury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential pressure was kept constant at 200 -500 mbar depending on the sample properties. The intrinsic sample permeability was derived from the apparent gas permeability, , determined for each pressure step using Darcy´s law (Liu et al 2017):…”
Section: Permeability Measurements and Pore Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%