2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15415.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of masses of the central black holes in NGC 524 and 2549 using laser guide star adaptive optics

Abstract: We present observations of early‐type galaxies NGC 524 and 2549 with laser guide star adaptive optics (LGS AO) obtained at GEMINI North telescope using the Near‐infrared Integral Field Spectrograph (NIFS) integral field unit (IFU) in the K band. The purpose of these observations is to determine high spatial resolution stellar kinematics within the nuclei of these galaxies and, in combination with previously obtained large‐scale observations with the SAURON IFU, to determine the masses (M•) of the supermassive … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(184 reference statements)
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the comparison between the HST image and the collapsed data cubes allows for the center of the NIFS and PPAK apertures to be defined. The core of the NIFS PSF is larger than expected for AO observations (e.g., Krajnović et al 2009;Seth et al 2014), which is likely the result of using a fairly faint, off-axis tip-tilt star. In Section 7.1, we test the effect of our assumed NIFS PSF on the inferred black hole mass by instead estimating the PSF from NIFS observations we acquired of the tip-tilt star itself.…”
Section: Measuring the Psfmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the comparison between the HST image and the collapsed data cubes allows for the center of the NIFS and PPAK apertures to be defined. The core of the NIFS PSF is larger than expected for AO observations (e.g., Krajnović et al 2009;Seth et al 2014), which is likely the result of using a fairly faint, off-axis tip-tilt star. In Section 7.1, we test the effect of our assumed NIFS PSF on the inferred black hole mass by instead estimating the PSF from NIFS observations we acquired of the tip-tilt star itself.…”
Section: Measuring the Psfmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…While this approach is commonly used in black hole mass measurement work (e.g., Krajnović et al 2009;Seth et al 2010;Walsh et al 2012), estimation of the PSF from AO observations is notoriously difficult owing to the constantly changing quality of the AO correction and the combination of data cubes from multiple nights. Therefore, we also estimated the PSF in a different manner in order to assess how strongly the adopted NIFS PSF affects M BH .…”
Section: Error Budgetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LOSVD was largely constrained by the strong 12 CO(2−0) and 12 CO(3−1) bandheads, which were contained within the 2.26 − 2.39 µm fitting region. We masked the Ca I absorption line because our template library does not include cool dwarf stars (e.g., Krajnović et al 2009), and further excluded a few artificial features, likely the result of imperfect sky subtraction or telluric correction. Example fits with pPXF to the observed galaxy spectra located at the nucleus, in an intermediate region, and in one of the outermost spatial bins are given in Figure 1.…”
Section: Stellar Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following past work (e.g., Krajnović et al 2009;Seth et al 2014), the MGE in Section 2 was convolved with the NIFS PSF and compared to the Mrk 1216 data cube, after collapsing along the wavelength axis. This resulted in best-fit values of 0.…”
Section: Psf Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%