2020
DOI: 10.31545/intagr/130634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of mechanical properties for wood pellets used in DEM simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond elasticity modulus E b and its strength σ c decreased as MC increased and σ z decreased. The range of variability of the bond elasticity modulus applied in the DEM simulations (Table 5) from 9.2 MPa (birch, MC = 20%, and σ z = 60 MPa) to 120 MPa (oak, MC = 8%, and σ z = 120 MPa) was consistent with a range of values (3-146 MPa) determined experimentally for wood pellets in the puncture test [51][52][53]. The approximately twofold decrease in the bond elasticity modulus with an increase in MC from 8% to 20% applied in our simulations fitted very well to the rate of decrease in pellet elasticity determined experimentally by Gallego et al [51].…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The bond elasticity modulus E b and its strength σ c decreased as MC increased and σ z decreased. The range of variability of the bond elasticity modulus applied in the DEM simulations (Table 5) from 9.2 MPa (birch, MC = 20%, and σ z = 60 MPa) to 120 MPa (oak, MC = 8%, and σ z = 120 MPa) was consistent with a range of values (3-146 MPa) determined experimentally for wood pellets in the puncture test [51][52][53]. The approximately twofold decrease in the bond elasticity modulus with an increase in MC from 8% to 20% applied in our simulations fitted very well to the rate of decrease in pellet elasticity determined experimentally by Gallego et al [51].…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The range of variability of the bond elasticity modulus applied in the DEM simulations (Table 5) from 9.2 MPa (birch, MC = 20%, and σ z = 60 MPa) to 120 MPa (oak, MC = 8%, and σ z = 120 MPa) was consistent with a range of values (3-146 MPa) determined experimentally for wood pellets in the puncture test [51][52][53]. The approximately twofold decrease in the bond elasticity modulus with an increase in MC from 8% to 20% applied in our simulations fitted very well to the rate of decrease in pellet elasticity determined experimentally by Gallego et al [51]. The order of magnitude of the bond elasticity modulus (10 7 -10 8 Pa) and the corresponding range of the normal stiffness coefficient of the bond (10 10 -10 11 N m −3 ) applied in our study were similar to the values of the bond elasticity and stiffness applied in the DEM modelling of loading of pinewood chip briquettes by Xia et al [38], the durability of wood pellets found by Mahajan et al [39], and the breakage of biomass pellets studied by Gilvari et al [40].…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The corresponding tensile strength of the bonds σ c applied to the BPM model of oak and birch pellets was 36 and 10.1 MPa, respectively. The range of values of the bond elastic modulus E b that were applied to DEM simulations corresponded to the range of values determined experimentally in the puncture test of wood pellets (Gallego et al, 2020). It was found that the relative difference in the values of the bond parameters that were applied to the DEM modelling of pellets made from the sawdust of hard (oak) and soft (birch) wood materials corresponded to the relative difference in the elastic properties of intact wood for those materials presented in the literature (Kretschmann, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The pine-wood pellets used in this work had an apparent mean density of 660 kg/m 3 . Table 1 shows the dimensions and moisture content as experimentally obtained by the authors [39], and the values for other properties (calorific power or apparent density without and under compaction) as provided by the manufacturer (Coterram Generation S.A.). Durability Index was also provided by the manufacturer, and it was calculated following the EN ISO 17831-1:2015 standard [40].…”
Section: Properties Of the Examined Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%