Abstract.A crystal plasticity based full-field microstructure simulation approach is used to virtually determine mechanical properties of sheet metals. Microstructural features like the specific grain morphology and the crystallographic texture are taken into account to predict the plastic anisotropy. A special focus is on the determination of the Lankford coefficients and on the yield surface under plane stress conditions. Compared to experimental procedures, virtual material testing allows to generate significantly more data points on the yield surface. This data is used to calibrate anisotropic elasto-plastic material models which are commonly used for sheet metal forming simulations. A numerical study is carried out to analyze the influence of the chosen points on the yield surface on the calibration procedure.
IntroductionAn accurate description of the elasto-plastic material behavior is needed for a precise simulation of sheet metal forming processes. Here, the two most important aspects of the material models are the description of the hardening and the yield locus. To account for the anisotropy of sheet metals, an increasing number of anisotropic yield locus models is available, starting from the well-known Hill48 [1] yield locus description up to more modern models like Yld2000-2d [2]. It is known, that the simpler yield locus descriptions are usually not sufficient to model the plastic material behavior accurately, especially for recently developed advanced high strength steels and also for aluminum alloys. In the case of an associated flow rule, the curvature of the yield locus defines also the development of the plastic strain components which is of high importance for sheet metal forming simulations.Besides the choice of an appropriate yield locus model, the identification of the model parameters is an important issue, especially when more complex yield locus models with more parameters are considered. The determination of the parameters of more sophisticated yield locus models requires a large number of experiments which can be difficult and expensive to realize. In a standard parameter identification procedure the number of experimental results (yield stresses, r-values) usually corresponds to the number of free parameters in the yield locus model. The experimental data which were considered for the parameter identification can then be precisely reproduced by the yield locus model. However, accuracy for other stress states is unclear.Here, the concept of virtual material testing is an interesting approach. It allows to significantly extend the limited experimental data base by additional virtual experiments. These virtual data can be used as additional input for a precise parameter identification or for the assessment of yield locus models.