“…The results were averaged over five tests for each indenter. Since the method [4] implies the use of conical indenters, we found, as is customary [8,9], the equivalent conical indenters with interfacial angles of 97°, 129°, and 140.6°, respectively, for the above pyramidal indenters from the equality of the surface areas of projections. The use of conical indenters in modeling allowed us to solve the problem in the axially symmetric formulation instead of the volumetric one, thus considerably reducing the amount of calculations.…”