1972
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90467-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of methionine sulfoxide content of intact protein based on rearrangement of sulfoxide with acetic anhydride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Partial destruction of MetSO was thus indicated to have occurred during alkaline hydrolysis. Although MetSO has been considered to be stable to alkaline hydrolysis (Neumann, 1972), this stability to alkali has been questioned (Lunder, 1972).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial destruction of MetSO was thus indicated to have occurred during alkaline hydrolysis. Although MetSO has been considered to be stable to alkaline hydrolysis (Neumann, 1972), this stability to alkali has been questioned (Lunder, 1972).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attempt to quantitate methionine oxidation via the Pummerer rearrangement was reported in 1972 by Lunder . However, we have been unable to reproduce his results, and there are no published papers that used this protocol.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…interpretation of the results of feeding experiments. Methionine sulfoxide in proteins has been determined by two direct methods, one involving alkaline hydrolysis and determination of the methionine sulfoxide by automatic amino acid analysis (Neumann, 1967) and the other involving a reaction with acetic anhydride and determination of the formaldehyde formed by a color reaction with chromotropic acid (Lunder, 1972).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon hydrolysis the methionine sulfone is determined by ion-exchange chromatography (Neumann, 1967;Slump and Schreuder, 1973;Sjóberg and Bostrom, 1977). The direct method, involving alkaline hydrolysis, may result in low recoveries of methionine sulfoxide (Neumann, 1967;Lunder, 1972). The indirect method with iodoacetic acid is complicated and time consuming and is 0021-8561Z83/1431-0063$01.50/0 © 1983 American Chemical Society therefore not very suitable for routine analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%