1996
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(96)00030-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of methylisoborneol in channel catfish pond water by solid phase extraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this method greatly improves the limits of detection and is less time-consuming compared to CLSA, analysis of low-boilingpoint compounds, such as sulfides is difficult [29,30]. Solid-phase extraction (SPE), as a powerful extraction technique for analysis of water odors, is time-consuming and unsuitable for the analysis of low-boiling-point odors [31][32][33][34]. As technology advances, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) have become the most popular extraction techniques in treating and neutralizing a large number of water 0021-9673/$ -see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this method greatly improves the limits of detection and is less time-consuming compared to CLSA, analysis of low-boilingpoint compounds, such as sulfides is difficult [29,30]. Solid-phase extraction (SPE), as a powerful extraction technique for analysis of water odors, is time-consuming and unsuitable for the analysis of low-boiling-point odors [31][32][33][34]. As technology advances, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) have become the most popular extraction techniques in treating and neutralizing a large number of water 0021-9673/$ -see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conte et al [9] determined that 2 mL eluting solvent was enough for 2-MIB elution. The optimum volume can be obtained using a modified method described in Ref.…”
Section: Eluting Solvent Volume Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimum volume can be obtained using a modified method described in Ref. [9]: load a C18 column with a mixture of five compounds(10 μg$mL -1 , 1mL) and repeatedly rinse the column using l mL portions of methanol, and it was found out that after a single rinse, 88% (average) of the five compounds had been eluted; after two rinses, over 95% (average) of the five compounds had been eluted; and after three rinses, all the compounds had been eluted. Thus, 3 mL methanol is sufficient for all the five compounds.…”
Section: Eluting Solvent Volume Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Because of the extremely high sensitivity required for detection of these compounds, it is essential to have enrichment or extraction steps before GC-MS analysis. A variety of enrichment/extraction techniques including closed-loop stripping analysis, 12,16 hollow fiber stripping analysis, 11 liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), 14,17,18 solid-phase extraction (SPE), 10,19,20 purge and trap, 8,9 headspace liquid-phase microextraction, 21,22 stir bar sorptive extraction, [23][24][25] and solidphase microextraction (SPME) 8,13,15,[26][27][28][29][30][31] have been applied to preconcentrate trace amounts of MIB and GSM in water. While most of these sample pretreatment procedures provide detection limits of $1 ng L À1 for MIB and GSM, lower detection limits were obtained by using closed-loop stripping (0.01-0.03 ng L À1 ), 12 stir bar sorptive extraction (0.025-0.041 ng L…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%