1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)95506-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of methylmercury in the presence of inorganic mercury by anodic stripping voltammetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers [6,46,33] observed that Hg inorg and MM had the same peak potential for oxidation of Hg 0 , but that their reduction potential are different; they affirmed that it was possible to deposit Hg inorg at the electrode surface at 0 ÷ -0.3 V, whereas more negative potentials (-0.5 ÷ -1 V) are necessary for the reduction of MM.…”
Section: Determination Of Total Mercurymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Other researchers [6,46,33] observed that Hg inorg and MM had the same peak potential for oxidation of Hg 0 , but that their reduction potential are different; they affirmed that it was possible to deposit Hg inorg at the electrode surface at 0 ÷ -0.3 V, whereas more negative potentials (-0.5 ÷ -1 V) are necessary for the reduction of MM.…”
Section: Determination Of Total Mercurymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Works concerning the application of gold nanoparticle-based electrodes for the quantification of methylmercury have never been published. Many researchers hypothesized that the reduction mechanism of CH 3 Hg + on gold [44] is similar to that proposed at the mercury electrode [33]. A widely accepted mechanism is that of Heaton and Laitinen who studied the reduction of methylmercury at a DME [31].…”
Section: Determination Of Methylmercurymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations