2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of microbiological contamination sources during frozen snail meat processing stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
29
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The value was close to 6.85 for Helix aspersa, a land snail popular to the European (Temelli et al, 2006). The TVC from the different markets and farms were also higher than the recommended levels acceptable of 5×10 5 CFU/g for shell fish and fishery product (ICMSF, 1980).…”
Section: Microbiological Quality Of Snails From Two Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The value was close to 6.85 for Helix aspersa, a land snail popular to the European (Temelli et al, 2006). The TVC from the different markets and farms were also higher than the recommended levels acceptable of 5×10 5 CFU/g for shell fish and fishery product (ICMSF, 1980).…”
Section: Microbiological Quality Of Snails From Two Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Similarly, Staphylococcus counts of 3.96 log 10 was reported for life snails before boiling by Temelli et al (2006). In another study conducted on the microflora of snail farm soil, an average range (log 10 ) of 3.17 and 3.41 was obtained for Staphylococcal count (Ekundayo and Fagade, 2005).…”
Section: Microbiological Quality Of Snails From Two Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of dismissal was proposed to be elevated at 5-7ºC; at which temperature there is considerable spoilage since the dismissal is a very good medium for bacterial growth (Hermansen et al, 1983). Foods in exposure with contaminated surfaces may have their microbiological quality weakened, principally if they're ingested raw or if the heat treatment is not sufficient for inactivating vegetative cells or bacterial toxins that might be available (Temelli et al, 2006;Jha et al, 2010). Bad hygienization operations of surfaces that make exposure with fish throughout all production levels are also a important factor for the quality of the final product.…”
Section: Results:-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor hygienization processes of surfaces that make contact with fish during all production stages are also a crucial factor for the quality of the final product (Kusumaningrum et al, 2003;Temelli et al, 2006;Mol and Tosun, 2011). Dirt particles and microorganisms that fail to be removed by correct hygienization procedures may start adhesion processes and lead to the formation of biofilms (Andrade, 2008;Salustiano et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%