2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5sm02336j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of mosaicity in oriented stacks of lipid bilayers

Abstract: Two methods of measuring the misorientation of domains in oriented multilamellar stacks of lipid bilayers superficially appeared to give different values for the mosaic spread. It is first shown that the traditional rocking method and a newer ring method give the same value of the mosaic spread when the two types of data are similarly analyzed. Both indicate a long-tailed, nearly Lorentzian, mosaic distribution function. Our primary innovation is the analysis of ring data as a function of the rocking angle. Fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lobes of diffuse scattering result from fluctuational disorder that occurs spontaneously in fully hydrated, oriented bilayers. Analysis of the weak arcs emanating from the diffuse, white lobes [43] indicates a small mosaic spread (i.e., an excellent bilayer alignment) with mosaic spread <1 degree. Although visual comparison shows only small differences between the lobes of diffuse scattering data in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lobes of diffuse scattering result from fluctuational disorder that occurs spontaneously in fully hydrated, oriented bilayers. Analysis of the weak arcs emanating from the diffuse, white lobes [43] indicates a small mosaic spread (i.e., an excellent bilayer alignment) with mosaic spread <1 degree. Although visual comparison shows only small differences between the lobes of diffuse scattering data in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method takes advantage of the fact that oriented samples are never perfect, but have mosaicity consisting of many misoriented microdomains within the footprint of the beam. The angular distribution of this apparently continuous mosaicity is closer to Lorentzian than to Gaussian, 22 so an exposure at a fixed substrate angle  F not equal to a Bragg angle  h still shows peaks for the h th order with the relative intensity decreasing gradually for those peaks with Bragg angles further from the fixed exposure angle, i.e., for larger | F - h |. The new method sets the fixed angle midway between the Bragg angle of two orders,  F = ½ ( h1 +  h2 ).…”
Section: B Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, diffraction from mis-oriented domains is cut off by the rotating substrate when the domains are mis-oriented by more than the Bragg angle  h ≈ 0.5h degrees in our setup. The width of the mosaic distribution for our oriented samples is difficult to obtain accurately and is subject to some ambiguity due to long tails in the mosaic distribution, 22 but supposing that it could be as large as 0.5 degrees for this gel phase sample would substantially reduce the intensity I h=1 but would hardly reduce I h for h≥3. We did observe some reduction in the ratio of I 1 /I 3 by comparison with intensity ratios obtained from multilamellar vesicles (MLV) in capillaries which do not suffer from this cutoff artifact.…”
Section: Repeat Spacings and Peak Intensitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After addition of Ca 2+ the compacted phase had a mosaicity of 0.26°. Both values show a reasonable orientation for hydrated samples [ 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%