2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2012.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of muon attenuation lengths in depth profiles from in situ produced cosmogenic nuclides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subscript i refers to different production pathways; for 10 Be this is dominated by spallation (26), with a minor contribution from muogenic production. Production due to muons is modeled with a single exponential term (25). S T is a topographic shielding scaling factor that adjusts the incoming cosmic ray flux depending on the proportion of the sky blocked by the presence of the cliff and is modeled following established procedures (15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The subscript i refers to different production pathways; for 10 Be this is dominated by spallation (26), with a minor contribution from muogenic production. Production due to muons is modeled with a single exponential term (25). S T is a topographic shielding scaling factor that adjusts the incoming cosmic ray flux depending on the proportion of the sky blocked by the presence of the cliff and is modeled following established procedures (15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For spallation, the value of P = 4.008 at·g −1 ·y −1 was obtained for the field site from the Lifton et al (14) scaling scheme. For muogenic production a single median value of P = 0.028 at·g −1 · y −1 was used to integrate both fast muon interactions and negative muon capture reactions (25). z * i = ρ r =Λ i is a production pathway-specific attenuation length scale, where ρ r is rock density (1,800 kg/m 3 used here for chalk) (17) and Λ i is the attenuation factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used a reference production rate for neutrogenic spallation of 3.93 atoms g −1 a −1 (Heyman, 2014) and the scaling model by Lal (1991) and Stone (2000) to calculate the production rate for each site. Because the standard files for calculating muogenic production rate after Heisinger et al (2002a, b) yield too-high values (Braucher et al, 2003(Braucher et al, , 2013Phillips et al, 2016), we used the .m files provided Ruszkiczay-Rüdiger et al (2016). Calculations were done until 100 000 solutions were found.…”
Section: Depth Profile Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Rovey (2008), modified to fit muon interaction cross-sections described in Braucher et al (2013), Balco et al (2013) and references therein. Thus, instead of the original values determined experimentally by Heisinger, we used the following values in the CRONUS Matlab code: k neg10=1.2916e-04, k neg26=0.0016, sigma190 10=3.7822e-29, sigma190 26=6.9599e-28.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%