Determination of Nitrate in the Edible Part of Vegetables from Markets Around Chiang Mai City, Northern Thailand by using High Performance Liquid Chromatography

Hongsibsong, Surat; Polyiem, Watcharapon; Narksen, Warangkana; Kerdnoi, Tanyaporn; Prapamontol, Tippawan

doi:10.3923/ajar.2014.204.210

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sample preparation and extraction were conducted according to the method developed by Hongsibsong et al [29]. Firstly, the non-edible parts of the F&V were separated and then the rest was washed with distilled water.…”

Section: Sample Preparation and Extractionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Monitoring and exposure assessment of nitrate intake via fruits and vegetables in high and low risk areas for gastric cancer

Ghaffari

Nasseri

Yunesian

et al. 2019

J Environ Health Sci Engineer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Gastric cancer (GC) is the first leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Iran. GC is a multifactorial disease and is caused by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. The aim of this study was to assess the exposure and risk of nitrate intake through fruits and vegetables (F&V) in high-risk area (HRA) and low-risk area (LRA) of GC in Iran. Methods Twenty nine species of F&V were examined for nitrate by reverse-phase HPLC (RP-HPLC) method. Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) data of 2000 adults participating in Persian cohort were applied to determine consumption patterns of F&V in those areas. A point-estimate daily intake was applied to compare two areas in terms of nitrate intake. Monte-Carlo simulation technique was applied to estimate chronic daily intake (CDI) of nitrate.Results The results showed that point-estimate daily intake of nitrate for subjects participated in the study was 2.02 ± 1.02 mg kg −1 day −1 in HRA and 1.98 ± 1.05 mg kg −1 day −1 in LRA. 6.53% of the participants in the HRA, and 5.9% of the participants in the LRA had an unacceptable point-estimate daily intake compared with an acceptable limit of 3.7 mg kg −1 day −1 established by FAO/WHO. CDI of nitrate in HRA was 1.94 ± 0.95 mg kg −1 day −1 and in the LRA was 1.93 ± 1.06 mg kg −1 day −1 . Conclusion The results showed that there is no difference between HRA and LRA in terms of nitrate intake through F&V.

show abstract

Section: Sample Preparation and Extractionmentioning

confidence: 99%