2020
DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2020.1829887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of optimal operating parameters for tetracycline removal by adsorption from synthetic and real aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the selection of the most adequate breakthrough curve model, five statistical metrics were applied. The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), widely used in adsorption works ,, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ( R ajstd 2 ) both based on its maximization. And three Bayesian metrics, the Akaike information criterion ( AIC : eq ), , the corrected Akaike information criterion ( AIC C : eq ), and the Bayesian information criterion ( BIC : eq ) based on its minimization. A I C = prefix− 2 0.25em normall o normalg 0.25em [ p false( boldX false| bold-italicθ false) ] + 2 N normalP where N P is the total number of parameters and p ( X | θ ) represents the likelihood function. AI C C = AIC + 2 N normalP ( N P + 1 ) N obs N normalP 1 where N obs is the number of observations from the sample that was applied. B I C = prefix− 2 0.25em 0.25em normall o normalg 0.25em [ p false( boldX...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the selection of the most adequate breakthrough curve model, five statistical metrics were applied. The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), widely used in adsorption works ,, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ( R ajstd 2 ) both based on its maximization. And three Bayesian metrics, the Akaike information criterion ( AIC : eq ), , the corrected Akaike information criterion ( AIC C : eq ), and the Bayesian information criterion ( BIC : eq ) based on its minimization. A I C = prefix− 2 0.25em normall o normalg 0.25em [ p false( boldX false| bold-italicθ false) ] + 2 N normalP where N P is the total number of parameters and p ( X | θ ) represents the likelihood function. AI C C = AIC + 2 N normalP ( N P + 1 ) N obs N normalP 1 where N obs is the number of observations from the sample that was applied. B I C = prefix− 2 0.25em 0.25em normall o normalg 0.25em [ p false( boldX...…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the selection of the most adequate breakthrough curve model, five statistical metrics were applied. The coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), widely used in adsorption works ,, and the adjusted coefficient of determination ( R ajstd 2 ) both based on its maximization. And three Bayesian metrics, the Akaike information criterion ( AIC : eq ), , the corrected Akaike information criterion ( AIC C : eq ), and the Bayesian information criterion ( BIC : eq ) based on its minimization. where N P is the total number of parameters and p ( X | θ ) represents the likelihood function. where N obs is the number of observations from the sample that was applied. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies present in the literature have found similar results, in which the increase in the adsorbent concentration also causes an increase in the removal of the selected pollutant until its saturation. 12,26,29 3.4. Influence of the Contact Time.…”
Section: Influence Of the Adsorbent Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44,45 Inverse problems can be defined as those that aim to determine causes from experimental measures of effects; thus, its solution, being the estimation of the parameters, is usually done through the minimum squares method. 26,29,46,47 Although, this approach can modify the intrinsic interpretation of the parameters, violating the assumptions of the method, because a priori information on the parameters and uncertainties of the measurements are not implemented in its resolution. 45,48−52 The removal efficiency of the adsorbent is obtained from equilibrium and kinetic batch assays, which provides the adsorption capacity and process velocity, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the identification of CAF and AMP in surface water, samples were prepared using the solid phase extraction technique (EFS), using cartridges containing reversed polymeric phase (Strata-X, Phenomenex) and a Manifold system (Supelco). Methods were determined/adapted from existing methodologies (Ruela et al 2005;Jank et al 2014;Arsand et al 2018;Costa et al 2020).…”
Section: Sample Preparation For Antibiotic Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%