2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.535926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of optimal parameters for CD-SEM measurement of line-edge roughness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deposited lines are significantly thinner in width than the nominal CD, showing an average width of $45 nm, with a standard deviation of $10 nm, showing significant line edge roughness (LER). 12 Some of this LER can be attributed to the grain size in the poly-crystalline AlN membrane material. The edges of the lines in the SEMs of the etched oxide patterns shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposited lines are significantly thinner in width than the nominal CD, showing an average width of $45 nm, with a standard deviation of $10 nm, showing significant line edge roughness (LER). 12 Some of this LER can be attributed to the grain size in the poly-crystalline AlN membrane material. The edges of the lines in the SEMs of the etched oxide patterns shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that detailed mathematical descriptions of the PSD, HHCF, and SVL functions used here and the extraction of spatial parameters such as correlation length and roughness exponents from these functions can readily be found in the literature. References in this area specifically dealing with resist LER include [2][3][4]6]. As is typically done in the literature, we assume the line-edge residuals to be well described in terms of self-affine fractal scaling.…”
Section: Metric Extraction Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4], we assume noise in the measurement process to be represented as additive white Gaussian noise on the true edge position data. We can thus simply add Gaussian noise to the ideal model edge data from above and observe its effect on metric extraction characteristics.…”
Section: Noise Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…͑11͒ does not calculate the true value ͑popu-lation variance of LWR͒ but contains the SEM-image-noise component. 37,38 In the case when a nonstochastic variation coexists as in this study, its variance is further added to the experimental value. To confirm this, we subtracted the aforedetermined variances of the first, second, and image-noise components from the experimental value obtained using Eq.…”
Section: B Variance Of Nonstochastic Lwrmentioning
confidence: 99%