2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11041-010-9309-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of optimum design parameters of water-drop cooling devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reheat temperature of the heat probe was 800 ± 10°C. The dependence of the heattransfer coefficient (a) on the temperature of the surface of the heat probe was determined by a technique presented in [6,7]. Numerical modeling of structural transformations in water-drop quenching was performed by means of the prediction technique presented in [8].…”
Section: Methods Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reheat temperature of the heat probe was 800 ± 10°C. The dependence of the heattransfer coefficient (a) on the temperature of the surface of the heat probe was determined by a technique presented in [6,7]. Numerical modeling of structural transformations in water-drop quenching was performed by means of the prediction technique presented in [8].…”
Section: Methods Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used centrifugal jet atomizers for water drip quenching of mill rollers [9,10]. An atomizer consisted of a cylindrical insert with three through openings (two peripheral openings located in one line at equal distances from the central opening) and a nozzle with a conical chamber for stirring swirling flows of water.…”
Section: Methods Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%