2015
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2015.1028925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of oral mucosal Poisson’s ratio and coefficient of friction fromin-vivocontact pressure measurements

Abstract: Despite their considerable importance to biomechanics, there are no existing methods available to directly measure apparent Poisson's ratio and friction coefficient of oral mucosa. This study aimed to develop an inverse procedure to determine these two biomechanical parameters by utilizing in vivo experiment of contact pressure between partial denture and beneath mucosa through nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis and surrogate response surface (RS) modelling technique. First, the in vivo denture-mucosa cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the JKR model, the indentation for a sphere-planar geometry is given by: where R is the radius of the sphere, F adh the adhesive force, and r c is the contact radius which can be expressed as: and where K: where E is the Young modulus of the sample, and ν the Poisson’s ratio of the sample. According to recent investigations 43 , a value of 0.4 for ν was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the JKR model, the indentation for a sphere-planar geometry is given by: where R is the radius of the sphere, F adh the adhesive force, and r c is the contact radius which can be expressed as: and where K: where E is the Young modulus of the sample, and ν the Poisson’s ratio of the sample. According to recent investigations 43 , a value of 0.4 for ν was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A perfect clasp fitting was assumed for this simulation to reduce computational load with a focus on the mucosa-denture interface. The Augmented Lagrangian algorithm was adopted to simulate the denture-mucosa contact, with a low frictional coefficient assumed at 0.1 to mimic typical lubrication in the oral environment [ 47 , 48 , 49 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this series of studies provides important insight into the behavior of the tongue in a tribological contact, sample availability and variability might make it impractical to use pig tongue as a wide‐spread laboratory tool. As the knowledge of oral surfaces expands, including mechanical properties (Chen, Ahmad, Li, Swain, & Li, ; Chen et al, ; Cheng, Gandevia, Green, Sinkus, & Bilston, ; Dresselhuis, de Hoog, Stuart, & van Aken, ; Zhang, Du, Zhou, & Yu, ), composition and mechanism of lubrication (Yakubov, Gibbins, Proctor, & Carpenter, ; Yakubov, Macakova, et al, ), it is expected that better oral mimetics will become available and allow for more accurate characterization of the tribology of food products. Only one notable study, by (Ranc, Servais, Chauvy, Debaud, & Mischler, ), appears to systematically assesses the effect of fabricated surface structures on friction behavior in a model tribosystem representing the tongue/palate contact.…”
Section: Soft‐tribology Measurement Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%