2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of parameters for the steric mass action model—A comparison between two approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, the model parameters are regressed to a limited number of experimental measurements. For ion exchange chromatography several isotherm models are available including Langmuir [1][2][3][4][5], steric mass action (SMA) [6][7][8], and statistical thermodynamic (ST) models [9][10][11]. Similarly, various rate models are available including models that assume the adsorption is kinetically limited, lumped rate models based on a linear driving force approximation, and the general rate model that describes the detailed mechanisms associated with diffusional mass transfer [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both cases, the model parameters are regressed to a limited number of experimental measurements. For ion exchange chromatography several isotherm models are available including Langmuir [1][2][3][4][5], steric mass action (SMA) [6][7][8], and statistical thermodynamic (ST) models [9][10][11]. Similarly, various rate models are available including models that assume the adsorption is kinetically limited, lumped rate models based on a linear driving force approximation, and the general rate model that describes the detailed mechanisms associated with diffusional mass transfer [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such an approach can be limited to predicting conditions that are close to those used to fit the elution peaks if the isotherm model applied does not describe faithfully adsorption equilibrium over a broader range of conditions. For example, Osberghaus et al [8] observed that different isotherm parameters were determined dependent on whether they were obtained by regressing the results of independent gradient elution and frontal analysis experiments or by fitting a mechanistic model directly to overloaded chromatographic data. The authors determined that although the model parameters could be adjusted to yield an accurate representation of an elution peak, the isotherm parameters were dependent on column characteristics, suggesting that these parameters were not true thermodynamic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for cytochrome c (53.4) and Osberghaus et al. for lysozyme (29.7–36.8) and cytochrome c (28.7–40.8) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The inverse method is commonly used in various areas of engineering to indirectly study underlying phenomena, for example in mechanistic modeling of chromatography to partially or fully determine parameters with comparably good success [22]. However, for the purpose of estimating parameters of SFE model structures it has been argued that an individual extraction curve contains relatively little information on its own to calibrate multiple…”
Section: Abrahamsson Et Al / J Of Supercritical Fluids 111 (2016)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In either case the material is contained in an extraction vessel with frits on either side to ensure that the material is kept in place [1]. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.01. 006 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%