2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of pharmaceutical compounds in hospital effluents and their contribution to wastewater treatment works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
104
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, more pronounced contributions were described in literature for antibiotics (Beier et al, 2011;Ort et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 2007;Verlicchi et al, 2012a), reaching, in some cases, contributions as high as 272% (ciprofloxacin) (Thomas et al, 2007), 94% (clarithromycin) (Beier et al, 2011) or 67% (azithromycin) (Verlicchi et al, 2012a). On the other hand, for some of the most consumed analgesics/NSAIDs (for instance, ibuprofen, diclofenac or acetaminophen) hospital contribution reported in literature did not exceed 15% (Beier et al, 2011;Langford and Thomas, 2009;Thomas et al, 2007;Verlicchi et al, 2012a), which is in agreement with our results in what concern to ibuprofen and diclofenac (contribution up to 4.2 and 9.5%, respectively) (data not shown), however for acetaminophen, the contribution of university and general hospitals went to 483 and 115%, respectively (data not shown). Nevertheless, the X-ray contrast agent iopromide, which had a mean total mass load of approximately 303 g d − 1 coming from hospital effluents, only contributed with approximately 13% of its total mass load found in WWTP influent, though Ort et al (2010) reported a minor contribution (less than 5%).…”
Section: Occurrence Of Pharmaceuticals In Urban Wastewaters: Loads Imentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, more pronounced contributions were described in literature for antibiotics (Beier et al, 2011;Ort et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 2007;Verlicchi et al, 2012a), reaching, in some cases, contributions as high as 272% (ciprofloxacin) (Thomas et al, 2007), 94% (clarithromycin) (Beier et al, 2011) or 67% (azithromycin) (Verlicchi et al, 2012a). On the other hand, for some of the most consumed analgesics/NSAIDs (for instance, ibuprofen, diclofenac or acetaminophen) hospital contribution reported in literature did not exceed 15% (Beier et al, 2011;Langford and Thomas, 2009;Thomas et al, 2007;Verlicchi et al, 2012a), which is in agreement with our results in what concern to ibuprofen and diclofenac (contribution up to 4.2 and 9.5%, respectively) (data not shown), however for acetaminophen, the contribution of university and general hospitals went to 483 and 115%, respectively (data not shown). Nevertheless, the X-ray contrast agent iopromide, which had a mean total mass load of approximately 303 g d − 1 coming from hospital effluents, only contributed with approximately 13% of its total mass load found in WWTP influent, though Ort et al (2010) reported a minor contribution (less than 5%).…”
Section: Occurrence Of Pharmaceuticals In Urban Wastewaters: Loads Imentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, few data is available on the contribution of hospital effluents towards the load of pharmaceuticals in WWTPs (Beier et al, 2011;Langford and Thomas, 2009;Ort et al, 2010;Thomas et al, 2007;Verlicchi et al, 2012a). At the same time, available data regarding the environmental risk posed by hospital effluents to aquatic organisms is still sparse and often limited to predicted (Escher et al, 2011;Souza et al, 2009) rather than measured concentrations (Verlicchi et al, 2012a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These emerging pollutants are continuously introduced into the aquatic environment by several emissions from manufacturing facilities, consumer use and disposal, and hospital waste (Langford and Thomas 2009;Philips et al 2010). Even though the detected concentrations are typically in the nanogram-to microgram-per-liter range, it cannot be excluded that molecules designed to be biologically active affect sensitive aquatic organisms even at such low concentrations (Huber et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These emerging pollutants are continuously introduced into the aquatic environment by several emissions from manufacturing facilities, consumer use and disposal, and hospital waste (Langford and Thomas 2009;Philips et al 2010). Even though the detected concentrations are typically in the nanogram-to microgram-perliter range, it cannot be excluded that molecules designed to be biologically active affect sensitive aquatic organisms even at such low concentrations (Huber et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%