2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.06.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of photo-active region in organic thin film solar cells with an organic heterojunction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solar cells made of stacked TPD and C 60 layers showed a photovoltage (V oc ) as high as 0.8 V, although they showed a rather low photocurrent density, as seen in the curve marked with "without heat treatment" in Figure 2. The V oc is considerably high compared with that of typical organic solar cells with a junction of CuPc/PV or CuPc/ C 60 , which show V oc of about 0.5 V. [2,10] Kushto et al also reported that a similar solar cell made of N,N′-di-[(1-naphthalenyl)-N,N′-diphenyl]-1,1′-biphenyl)-4,4′-diamine (a-NPD) and C 60 shows V oc of about 0.8 V. [11] The high V oc of their and our solar cells is attributed to the large energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level of the donor molecules (TPD, a-NPD) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of C 60 . For the V oc of organic thin-film solar cells, the importance of the energy difference has been discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solar cells made of stacked TPD and C 60 layers showed a photovoltage (V oc ) as high as 0.8 V, although they showed a rather low photocurrent density, as seen in the curve marked with "without heat treatment" in Figure 2. The V oc is considerably high compared with that of typical organic solar cells with a junction of CuPc/PV or CuPc/ C 60 , which show V oc of about 0.5 V. [2,10] Kushto et al also reported that a similar solar cell made of N,N′-di-[(1-naphthalenyl)-N,N′-diphenyl]-1,1′-biphenyl)-4,4′-diamine (a-NPD) and C 60 shows V oc of about 0.8 V. [11] The high V oc of their and our solar cells is attributed to the large energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level of the donor molecules (TPD, a-NPD) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of C 60 . For the V oc of organic thin-film solar cells, the importance of the energy difference has been discussed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For example, the exciton diffusion length in layers of Cu-phthalocyanine (CuPc, electron donor) and 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic bis-benzimidazole (PTCBI, electron acceptor), which are typical materials for the devices, is only about 10 nm. [2,3] This poses a serious problem of low photocurrent densities in these devices because most of the excitons generated in organic layers cannot reach the interface to generate carriers. To solve this problem, introduction of a ''bulk-heterojunction'' structure to organic solar cells has been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness dependence of the photocurrent response in solar cells is another technique to determine L D , but a simple exponential distribution of excitons based on optical penetration depth could be misleading because of the optical interference arising from the reflective metal counter electrode [11]. Some literature taking this influence into account has been published, but we believe it is controversial to determine L D from the thickness dependence of photocurrent response on the basis of reported L D values that can vary from a few to tens of nanometers; like for example, in the case of copper Pc (CuPc) [12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exciton diffusion length can be also obtained from photovoltage spectra [9], analysis of photoenhanced current [10] as well as from photocurrent generated by exciton dissociation at electrodes [11], [12] or at donoracceptor heterojunction [13]- [18]. Models of short-circuit photocurrent (J sc ) generated in photovoltaic devices and respecting reflection and interference of light in layers forming the system are presented in several works [14]- [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of L D for CuPc has been obviously estimated many times. We can mention here at least the following: (103)nm [2], 8nm [13], (6820)nm [15], (205)nm [17], 15.7nm [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%