1948
DOI: 10.1039/an9487300674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of phthalic esters in propellants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1955
1955
1959
1959

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most difficult problems associated with the analysis of propellants has been the elimination of inter-ferences due to nitrate esters and aromatic nitro compounds. The Lamond (7) procedure, which employs ammonium sulfide for the reduction of the nitrated compounds, is rather involved. The Mullaly (< §) technique, based on the earlier work of Dickson and Easterbrook (2) involves the reduction of nitroglycerin and nitro compounds with methanolic ferrous chloride.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most difficult problems associated with the analysis of propellants has been the elimination of inter-ferences due to nitrate esters and aromatic nitro compounds. The Lamond (7) procedure, which employs ammonium sulfide for the reduction of the nitrated compounds, is rather involved. The Mullaly (< §) technique, based on the earlier work of Dickson and Easterbrook (2) involves the reduction of nitroglycerin and nitro compounds with methanolic ferrous chloride.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest, the lead phthalate gravimetric method, proposed by Thames (12), is complicated and has been proved to be theoretically incorrect (10). The method of Lamond (5) applies an ammonium sulfide reduction procedure in order to separate the phthalates from the nitroesters and nitroaromatic bodies. It is, however, lengthy and time consuming because of the numerous operations involved in the separation of phthalates from the nitroesters and nitroaromatic bodies, as well as in the preparation of the ammonium sulfide reagent, according to the special requirements of the method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%