2000
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/33/3/314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of plasma velocity from light fluctuations in a dc plasma torch

Abstract: The fluctuations generated by arc root motion have been used to determine the velocity in a plasma jet. The phase angle relations resulting from time variations of light intensity profiles taken simultaneously across different sections of the plasma have been used to determine the velocity for different operating conditions of the dc torch. The experimental results have been compared with the theoretical predictions of a 2D MHD model of the dc plasma torch. The experimental and theoretical values appear to agr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Joule heat dissipated per unit length of the electric arc is about 3 kW/40 mm and 7 kW/40 mm (the arc length is 40 mm) for the respective flow rates and currents, which is comparable with the values calculated in [8] for a similar torch configuration. The velocity measurements described and compared with numerical calculations in [16] suggest that numerical results, including our predictions, tend to overestimate the observational data. The velocity measurements described and compared with numerical calculations in [16] suggest that numerical results, including our predictions, tend to overestimate the observational data.…”
Section: The Time Derivative Of Each Of the Unknowns Is Decreased (Inmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The Joule heat dissipated per unit length of the electric arc is about 3 kW/40 mm and 7 kW/40 mm (the arc length is 40 mm) for the respective flow rates and currents, which is comparable with the values calculated in [8] for a similar torch configuration. The velocity measurements described and compared with numerical calculations in [16] suggest that numerical results, including our predictions, tend to overestimate the observational data. The velocity measurements described and compared with numerical calculations in [16] suggest that numerical results, including our predictions, tend to overestimate the observational data.…”
Section: The Time Derivative Of Each Of the Unknowns Is Decreased (Inmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In practice, most of the available experimental data are related to spectroscopic Girard et al, 2006) and probe (Prevosto et al, 2008a(Prevosto et al, , 2008b(Prevosto et al, , 2009a) measurements in the external plasma region (the outer region between the nozzle exit and the anode, where the pressure has relatively small variations about the atmospheric value), giving information of only part of the variables involved, mostly temperatures and species concentrations. Although data on flow velocities are commonly reported for low-energy density (subsonic flow) non-transferred arc torches (e.g., Singh et al, 2000), measurement of flow velocities in cutting torches have been reported only recently by our Group (Prevosto et al, 2009b). …”
Section: Thermal Plasmasmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It was assumed R p = 150 μm and a plasma flow velocity of 100 m/s. 34 As it can be seen from Fig. 3, the space-charge layer is collisionless for electrons (λ e h) in the whole T e range, and also for ions (λ + h) if T e is higher than 8000 K; for T e lower than 11 000 K the ionization process in the adjacent plasma is not perturbed by the probe presence (L > d); for T e higher than about of 8000 K it results FIG.…”
Section: Double Floating Probe In High-pressure Highly Ionized mentioning
confidence: 99%