2020
DOI: 10.1134/s1061934820080158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soil and Bottom Sediments by Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Using Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the extractant phase was not separated in the case of dichloromethane. Satisfactory analyte recoveries were achieved by using chloroform, which agreed with the results of our previous study, i.e., the application of DLLME for the extraction of PAHs from soils and bottom sediments [ 38 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the extractant phase was not separated in the case of dichloromethane. Satisfactory analyte recoveries were achieved by using chloroform, which agreed with the results of our previous study, i.e., the application of DLLME for the extraction of PAHs from soils and bottom sediments [ 38 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The combination of DLLME with GC-MS is the simplest option, because chloroform can be directly injected into GC-MS after centrifugation. Previously optimized conditions of the GC-MS detection of PAHs in soils [ 38 ] were used in this work. The separation of isomeric pairs, such as phenanthrene/anthracene, chrysene/triphenylene/benz[a]anthracene, benz[b]fluoranthene/benz[k]fluoranthene and benz[a]pyrene/benz[e]pyrene, was achieved by using the temperature program: from 60 °C to 290 °C at the three stages on a specialized capillary column ( Figure 5 a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this method suffers from several drawbacks, such as long extraction time, excessive amount of extractant, no stirring to accelerate the reaction, and tendency to lead to thermal degradation of analytes. In recent years, there have been significant advances in extraction techniques for organic contaminants in soil media, including ultrasonic extraction [23][24][25][26], solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [27,28], mechanical oscillation extraction [29,30], pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) [31], accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) [32,33], and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) methods [34][35][36]. For example, ultrasonic extraction utilizes the force of fluctuations to efficiently extract analytes into the solvent, which reduces the consumption of organic solvents and improves efficiency [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gas chromatography (GC), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have been widely used for the detection of PAHs in soil. [17][18][19][20] Temerdasheva et al 21 proposed a method for the preparation of PAHs samples in soil (substrate) by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and successfully determined the contents of 20 PAHs in soil (substrate) by GC-MS with the limits of quantication (LOQs) of 0.2-0.5 mg kg −1 . Nevertheless, these methods have some disadvantages, such as complicated sample preprocessing process, labor-and material-intensive, can not ensure the complete extraction of PAHs, and can not meet the need for dynamic monitoring of soil pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%