2017
DOI: 10.1109/memc.0.7989988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of radiated emissions of an electrically large EUT: simulation and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, an EUT is called "electrically large" if ka > 1 and its maximum directivity can be estimated by (2). The approach has been validated by simulations and measurements in many publications, i.e., [14]- [17]. The theoretical curve resulting from (2) can be seen, e.g., in Figs.…”
Section: Unintentional Electromagnetic Radiatorsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Hence, an EUT is called "electrically large" if ka > 1 and its maximum directivity can be estimated by (2). The approach has been validated by simulations and measurements in many publications, i.e., [14]- [17]. The theoretical curve resulting from (2) can be seen, e.g., in Figs.…”
Section: Unintentional Electromagnetic Radiatorsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…RC or VIRC is regarded as an alternative technique to the FAR for RE testing. The advantage of this technique is that the direction or position of the EUT does not influence the results due to the statistical uniformity and isotropy inside the chamber [95]. Moreover, for further analysis, it's required only the total radiation power information after calibration of the chamber or chamber validation factor (CVF).…”
Section: Comparison: Rc Vs Vircmentioning
confidence: 99%