2014
DOI: 10.12737/4480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of rectilinearly enveloping mechanism kinematic parameters to reference sizes of working space through the example of press for carbody disposal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By reserving the tying of sutures until all had been placed, CIS method allowed better visualization of arterial edges compared with traditional CS method. Hence, the impressive results were achieved, despite a highly compromised work space . Moreover, In CS method, too much tension of the traction suture leads to anastomotic stenosis, while too small tension leads to bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By reserving the tying of sutures until all had been placed, CIS method allowed better visualization of arterial edges compared with traditional CS method. Hence, the impressive results were achieved, despite a highly compromised work space . Moreover, In CS method, too much tension of the traction suture leads to anastomotic stenosis, while too small tension leads to bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the impressive results were achieved, despite a highly compromised work space. 18,19 Moreover, In CS method, too much tension of the traction suture leads to anastomotic stenosis, while too small tension leads to bleeding. However, suture tension is not an issue in CIS method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%