2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of Regurgitant Orifice Area with the Use of a New Three-Dimensional Flow Convergence Geometric Assumption in Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively smaller EROA by 2D compared with 3D method is likely because of greater underestimation of EROA for 2 large asymmetrical orifices by 2D PISA and the errors in 2D PISA radius measurements because of the challenges in identifying the center of the regurgitant orifices particularly in the in vitro model. Also similar to previous 2D studies 10 but different from all previous 3D PISA publications, [5][6][7][8][9]12 this study compared the use of 3D peak and integrated PISA methods to quantify MR RVol. In the in vitro model, the RVol by the 3D peak and integrated PISA methods was accurate, whereas the 2D RVol was underestimated by 50%.…”
Section: Automated 3d Pisa-based Eroa and Rvolsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relatively smaller EROA by 2D compared with 3D method is likely because of greater underestimation of EROA for 2 large asymmetrical orifices by 2D PISA and the errors in 2D PISA radius measurements because of the challenges in identifying the center of the regurgitant orifices particularly in the in vitro model. Also similar to previous 2D studies 10 but different from all previous 3D PISA publications, [5][6][7][8][9]12 this study compared the use of 3D peak and integrated PISA methods to quantify MR RVol. In the in vitro model, the RVol by the 3D peak and integrated PISA methods was accurate, whereas the 2D RVol was underestimated by 50%.…”
Section: Automated 3d Pisa-based Eroa and Rvolsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The latter is specifically important in patients with functional MR where the regurgitant orifice is thought to be largest at the beginning and end of systole and smallest in the middle. 10,13 Although previous studies have shown that 3D methods are more accurate than 2D PISA methods for MR quantification, these studies either required significant manual interaction with the data or ongoing geometric assumptions [5][6][7][8][9] and were unable to account for the dynamic nature of the regurgitant orifice. [5][6][7][8][9]12 In this study, the 3D PISA was measured in an automated method without making any specific geometric assumptions.…”
Section: Automated 3d Pisa-based Eroa and Rvolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 On the other hand, a broad spectrum of irregularly shaped EROA is often found in patients with organic mitral valve disease. 6,7,20 Considering the ability of 3D color Doppler echocardiography to directly image the EROA without the assumption of rotational symmetry, this technique may be more accurate than 2D echocardiography for quantification of mitral regurgitation. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have compared the accuracy of 2D and 3D color Doppler techniques to quantify mitral regurgitant volume against reference methods (flowmeter standard and MRI).…”
Section: Quantification Of Mitral Regurgitation Using 2d Versus 3d Teementioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Studies have shown that estimates of effective regurgitant orifice area are more accurate when an elliptical-based formula is used to calculate effective regurgitant orifice area rather than a hemispheric-based one. 28,29 In fact, when fluid dynamic modeling is used, the shape of the flow convergence shell close to an irregular, nonplanar orifice results in an asymmetrical isovelocity shell, whereas farther from the orifice, it becomes more hemispheric. 30 This implies that although the proximal isovelocity surface area may appear symmetrical on single cut-plane 2D image, because of the hemispheric assumptions in the calculation, the accuracy of a proximal isovelocity surface area measurement derived from this image would be highly dependent on the distance of the measured radius from the regurgitant orifice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%