Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The role of the subsurface team is to reduce technical risk and uncertainty associated with profile delivery, for both hydrocarbon production and the injection of water or gases, enabling confident reservoir management and investment decisions. Core is a key resource for delivering this objective, providing the only opportunity to directly observe and measure the reservoir rock. However, it is expensive to acquire and the decision to take new core should be clearly linked to a business objective. A combination of depositional and diagenetic factors can result in carbonate reservoirs being highly heterogeneous, making them a challenge to find and develop. Core studies can significantly improve understanding of the controls on heterogeneity and its distribution within the subsurface, but to maximize value, they should be fully integrated with wireline logs, seismic and production or test data to predict likely reservoir behaviour. For example, thin (<1 m) high or low permeability zones can dominate production yet remain very subtle or undetectable in wireline log or seismic data alone. During exploration and appraisal, sufficient data and knowledge are required to enable appraise/develop or walk-away decisions. Appropriate geological description of core material helps to establish original volumes in place, net-to-gross, depositional setting, age, reservoir architecture and large-scale flow zones. Core material can also help establish other key reservoir parameters such as saturation, reservoir fluids, seismic rock properties and geomechanical properties as well as influencing decisions such as well design, development strategy and facility requirements. As a field is developed and production matures, reservoir behaviour may change and detail of the sedimentology, structure, diagenesis, baffles and thin heterolithic permeability zones may become more important. In carbonate reservoirs this often requires the integration of existing legacy core or new core material and targeted surveillance data e.g. injection and production logging tool (ILT/PLT) or saturation logs, to understand the stratigraphic, depositional and diagenetic controls on flow units and improve predictive capability. Moving a reservoir from natural depletion onto waterflood or enhanced oil recovery (EOR) may need more advanced core-based data from core flood experiments, to deliver maximum value from the reservoir. New core material, or detailed review and new sampling of existing or analogue legacy core, may be required to understand complex rock-fluid interactions and the value that waterflood or EOR could bring to a development. To maximize the value and insights gained from core it is essential to use it throughout a field's life. High quality description and a well-considered sampling regime should be carried out at the earliest opportunity to provide baseline data. However, periodically revisiting the core enables the entire subsurface team to keep testing hypotheses and refreshing models. Where there is no core material available in the field, analogue field core can be especially useful both to narrow uncertainty and explore possible alternative models. A multi-disciplinary approach, integrating new data with core observations helps refine and improve predictions, and can lead to the identification of significant additional opportunities as reservoir behaviour matures and field development progresses.
The role of the subsurface team is to reduce technical risk and uncertainty associated with profile delivery, for both hydrocarbon production and the injection of water or gases, enabling confident reservoir management and investment decisions. Core is a key resource for delivering this objective, providing the only opportunity to directly observe and measure the reservoir rock. However, it is expensive to acquire and the decision to take new core should be clearly linked to a business objective. A combination of depositional and diagenetic factors can result in carbonate reservoirs being highly heterogeneous, making them a challenge to find and develop. Core studies can significantly improve understanding of the controls on heterogeneity and its distribution within the subsurface, but to maximize value, they should be fully integrated with wireline logs, seismic and production or test data to predict likely reservoir behaviour. For example, thin (<1 m) high or low permeability zones can dominate production yet remain very subtle or undetectable in wireline log or seismic data alone. During exploration and appraisal, sufficient data and knowledge are required to enable appraise/develop or walk-away decisions. Appropriate geological description of core material helps to establish original volumes in place, net-to-gross, depositional setting, age, reservoir architecture and large-scale flow zones. Core material can also help establish other key reservoir parameters such as saturation, reservoir fluids, seismic rock properties and geomechanical properties as well as influencing decisions such as well design, development strategy and facility requirements. As a field is developed and production matures, reservoir behaviour may change and detail of the sedimentology, structure, diagenesis, baffles and thin heterolithic permeability zones may become more important. In carbonate reservoirs this often requires the integration of existing legacy core or new core material and targeted surveillance data e.g. injection and production logging tool (ILT/PLT) or saturation logs, to understand the stratigraphic, depositional and diagenetic controls on flow units and improve predictive capability. Moving a reservoir from natural depletion onto waterflood or enhanced oil recovery (EOR) may need more advanced core-based data from core flood experiments, to deliver maximum value from the reservoir. New core material, or detailed review and new sampling of existing or analogue legacy core, may be required to understand complex rock-fluid interactions and the value that waterflood or EOR could bring to a development. To maximize the value and insights gained from core it is essential to use it throughout a field's life. High quality description and a well-considered sampling regime should be carried out at the earliest opportunity to provide baseline data. However, periodically revisiting the core enables the entire subsurface team to keep testing hypotheses and refreshing models. Where there is no core material available in the field, analogue field core can be especially useful both to narrow uncertainty and explore possible alternative models. A multi-disciplinary approach, integrating new data with core observations helps refine and improve predictions, and can lead to the identification of significant additional opportunities as reservoir behaviour matures and field development progresses.
Core samples from the subsurface can provide unambiguous direct information to guide operator decisions. Core may be acquired with drilling equipment (full-bore core) or by post-drill wireline methods (sidewall core). Both approaches have distinct profiles of cost, risk, sample type and value, and an operator must select the most appropriate to progress business in an informed way. The option to selectively core after drilling and perceptions of lower cost and risk might indicate that sidewall coring will always be the best approach. Recent developments to increase the size and quality of rotary sidewall samples would only add weight to this view. It's not all good news for sidewall core, however. Individual sample size and total volume delivered per run are tiny; weak rock or high overbalance pressure may cause poor recovery and biased datasets; time between drilling and logging allows mud invasion and borehole relaxation so samples are often broken, and pore fluids contaminated. Sidewall sample sets therefore leave a higher degree of uncertainty when compared to full-bore core. It is this operator's view that both approaches have a role to play in reducing subsurface uncertainty, and cost, risk and value should be carefully considered when deciding which to apply.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.