2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of residual stress gradient in a Ti-stabilized austenitic stainless steel cladding candidate after carburization in liquid sodium at 500 °C and 600 °C

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 In another attempt, Slim and co-workers studied the residual stress profile of Ti-stabilized austenitic stainless steel cladding dependent on the carburization resulting in a zonewise residual stress profile. 37 Here, in the present work, the nature of the residual stress is somewhat different from the earlier works on AZO 14,40 by our group, which could be because of the change in microstructural behavior occurring with different growth conditions at low sputtering power. The crystallite sizes of MZO and AZO single layers and their multilayers are estimated using the Scherrer formula, as described in ref 40, and it is noticeable that with the increasing deposition time, crystallite size increases marginally for both MZO and AZO (see Figure 2f).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…35 In another attempt, Slim and co-workers studied the residual stress profile of Ti-stabilized austenitic stainless steel cladding dependent on the carburization resulting in a zonewise residual stress profile. 37 Here, in the present work, the nature of the residual stress is somewhat different from the earlier works on AZO 14,40 by our group, which could be because of the change in microstructural behavior occurring with different growth conditions at low sputtering power. The crystallite sizes of MZO and AZO single layers and their multilayers are estimated using the Scherrer formula, as described in ref 40, and it is noticeable that with the increasing deposition time, crystallite size increases marginally for both MZO and AZO (see Figure 2f).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Interestingly, in all these samples, the compressive nature of residual stresses is observed for lower tilt angles covering a few atomic layers, and at the higher tilt angles, the behavior of the residual stress gets modified to the tensile one, which is suggestive of the existence of the residual stress gradient in the samples. These types of studies play a vital role in examining the mechanical properties of materials like ductility, upon being subjected to different conditions such as the introduction of the residual stress profiles related to the gradient of the compositions in the matrix and the insertion of new phases. Surprisingly, the behavior of the residual stress is different for the five-layer system with AZO, as depicted in Figure e. Here, although the gradient of the residual stresses is present for samples A2 and AaA, it almost disappears in sample AaAaA and becomes purely compressive in nature, which is ascribed to varying dopant contents associated with the change in the dopant intake and ease of adjustment to the host crystal structure corresponding to different dopants. , Thus, sample AaAaA is likely to show good mechanical stability from the intuitive analogy of microstructural analysis in AZO/AgNP/AZO structures presented in ref .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2D detector to sample distance ( D = 1.5 m) and the detector tilts were calibrated using a cerium dioxide powder diffraction standard from NIST (CeO 2 – SRM 674b) and the pyFAI software suite . A similar setup has been used in refs and .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar procedures have been used in similar studies on other beamlines, for example, in [26][27][28].…”
Section: Hexrd-sin 2 ψmentioning
confidence: 99%