1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00010179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of root biomasses of three species grown in a mixture using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen

Abstract: A method is evaluated that employs variation in stable C and N isotopes from fractionations in C and N acquisition and growth to predict root biomasses of three plant species in mixtures. Moench (C4) were grown together in separate, three-species combinations. Surface roots (0-10cm depth) of each species from each of the two combinations were mixed in various proportions, and the relative abundances of lSN and 14N and 13C and 12C in prepared mixtures, surface roots of single species, and roots extracted from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All plant material was oven-dried to constant mass at 60 1C and weighed. The distinctive carbon (C) isotope signatures of C 3 forbs and C 4 grasses were used in a simple mixing model (Polley, Johnson, & Mayeux, 1992) to determine the relative contributions of each to root biomass recovered from grass/forb combinations (Sorghastrum/Ratibida and Bouteloua/Oenothera). The stable C isotope signature of each grass and forb was measured by mass spectometry (Isotope Services, Inc., Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA) on roots recovered from species monocultures.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All plant material was oven-dried to constant mass at 60 1C and weighed. The distinctive carbon (C) isotope signatures of C 3 forbs and C 4 grasses were used in a simple mixing model (Polley, Johnson, & Mayeux, 1992) to determine the relative contributions of each to root biomass recovered from grass/forb combinations (Sorghastrum/Ratibida and Bouteloua/Oenothera). The stable C isotope signature of each grass and forb was measured by mass spectometry (Isotope Services, Inc., Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA) on roots recovered from species monocultures.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recognized importance of water and its influence on patterns of aboveground net primary production (ANPP) in grasslands (Knapp and Smith 2001), ecological studies addressing belowground plant activity and functional rooting depth are rare, primarily because of the difficulty in assessing root growth, turnover and activity (Polley et al 1992;Craine et al 2002). An alternate approach to soil excavation and root mapping for inferring functional rooting depth and resource use has been to measure stable isotopic signatures of water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless little information on differences in the rooting patterns of species grown in sole crops or in mixtures is available to understand how root systems of different component crops interact with each other under field conditions. Knowledge of root system dynamics in relation to partitioning of belowground resources among plants grown in mixtures has been limited by the inadequacies of methods used to distinguish roots according to species (Polley et al, 1992;Tofinga and Snaydon, 1992). Commonly used methods such as trench profile methods or soil cores cannot distinguish the roots of individual species in a mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Svejcar and Boutton (1985) proposed a method based on large differences in stable carbon isotope composition of C 3 and C 4 plants in order to determine the fraction of the root biomass contributed by each type in a mixture. This method was further developed by Polley et al (1992) who used differences in 15 N natural abundance between legume and non-legume species to determine the contribution of each species to root biomass of the mixtures in a greenhouse experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%