2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of soluble sugar profile in rice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as our knowledge, no studies have been stated on the free sugar profile of hydrothermally treated non-tradition flakes with coloured layers. Nevertheless, Hu et al (2017) provided an approximate maltose content in milled rice grains up to 1.34 mg/g, fructose content up to 0.11 mg/g, and glucose content up to 2.29 mg/g [16]. Concentrations of sucrose, glucose, and fructose in quinoa seeds were the following: Up to 15.2, 8.0, and 1.6 mg/g, respectively [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as our knowledge, no studies have been stated on the free sugar profile of hydrothermally treated non-tradition flakes with coloured layers. Nevertheless, Hu et al (2017) provided an approximate maltose content in milled rice grains up to 1.34 mg/g, fructose content up to 0.11 mg/g, and glucose content up to 2.29 mg/g [16]. Concentrations of sucrose, glucose, and fructose in quinoa seeds were the following: Up to 15.2, 8.0, and 1.6 mg/g, respectively [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the determination of free sugars the milled samples (5 g of each) were extracted with 40 mL of redistilled water (30 °C) by stirring on the magnetic stirrer for 30 min. Then, the volumetric flask (50 mL) was filled up to mark with redistilled water and the sample mixture was filtered through KA 4 of filter paper [16]. Individual sugars were determined using the HPLC system (Dionex Ultimate 3000, Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to a detector (ERC RefractoMax 520, Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of MDA and proline in lettuce seedlings of each treatment was determined by the MDA (malondialdehyde, MDA, Content Assay Kit, Colorimetric Method) and Pro (proline, PRO, Content Assay Kit, Colorimetric Method) content kit produced by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Company. The contents of soluble sugar and soluble protein was assessed by the anthrone colorimetry method and the Coomassie Brilliant Blue method …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root length and root weight were measured by a standard ruler and 1/1000 balance; if 60% of the length of the root appeared blackish or brownish, it was calculated as a black root, and the rest were calculated as white roots; the roots shorter than 1 cm in length or decomposed were not calculated in root length and root weight. Root bleeding was collected by the cotton traps method [16], SS was performed according to Hu et al [17], GOT activity was measured through the method of Sax et al [18], and GPT and GS activity was tested via the methods of Zhong et al [19] and Yu and Zhang [20], respectively.…”
Section: Samples and Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%