2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2009.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of stagnation and convective zones in a solar cavity receiver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wu et al [16] reviewed different possible situations in convection losses; concluding that an inclination close to 90° makes the stagnant zone fill the cavity interior space; therefore, a stable temperature stratification is generated, which reduces the convective losses to negligible values. The distribution of this stagnation zone distribution was researched by Prakash et al [17], and the wind influence in that zone was studied by Xiao et al [18], who illustrated the wind velocity, wind inclination, and cavity inclination influence in the final convection losses. Wu et al [19] studied natural convection heat loss variation, concluding that it is more sensitive to tilt angle and aperture size, except when tilt angle is 90° (when the stagnant zone fills the interior space).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wu et al [16] reviewed different possible situations in convection losses; concluding that an inclination close to 90° makes the stagnant zone fill the cavity interior space; therefore, a stable temperature stratification is generated, which reduces the convective losses to negligible values. The distribution of this stagnation zone distribution was researched by Prakash et al [17], and the wind influence in that zone was studied by Xiao et al [18], who illustrated the wind velocity, wind inclination, and cavity inclination influence in the final convection losses. Wu et al [19] studied natural convection heat loss variation, concluding that it is more sensitive to tilt angle and aperture size, except when tilt angle is 90° (when the stagnant zone fills the interior space).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be pointed out that in the investigations just descdribed, the general boundary conditions were that the cavity walls had uniform temperature or one wall had uniform temperature and the other walls were considered adiabatic [5]. However, in some practical applications the cavities are subjected to constant heat flux boundary conditions, and the results summarized thus far may not accord with the facts and cannot be referenced by simple transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of the stagnation zone and the convection zone was first proposed. Recently, Prakash et al [5] performed experimental and numerical studies to identify these two zones in a cylindrical cavity with a wind skirt, and a parameter called "critical air temperature gradient" was defined for this purpose. A Nusselt number incorporating inclination and aperture size was developed by Koenig and Marvin [6] based on the study of cylindrical cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study the accuracy of the nite volume (FV) method was evaluated in comparison to Monte Carlo (MC) techniques for both the concentrated solar energy and the energy emitted by heated surfaces in a receiver. The stagnation and convective zones in a solar cavity receiver were determined by Prakash, Kedare, and Nayak [13]. They carried out experimental and numerical studies to identify these zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%