2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.02242
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of stellar parameters for Ariel targets: a comparison analysis between different spectroscopic methods

A. Brucalassi,
M. Tsantaki,
L. Magrini
et al.

Abstract: Ariel has been selected as the next ESA M4 science mission and it is expected to be launched in 2028. During its 4-year mission, Ariel will observe the atmospheres of a large and diversified population of transiting exoplanets. A key factor for the achievement of the scientific goal of Ariel is the selection strategy for the definition of the input target list. A meaningful choice of the targets requires an accurate knowledge of the planet hosting star properties and this is necessary to be obtained well befor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) with our T eff and log g values alongside the PARSEC isochrones (Bressan et al 2012). The isochrones we represent in the Kiel diagram encompass our points and they are well-behaved even for the coolest stars in the main-sequence, contrary to what has been found in previous works (see Mortier et al 2014;Montes et al 2018;Tsantaki et al 2019;Brucalassi et al 2021). Finally, we compared our V broad values to those of other late-type stars.…”
Section: Stellar Atmospheric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7) with our T eff and log g values alongside the PARSEC isochrones (Bressan et al 2012). The isochrones we represent in the Kiel diagram encompass our points and they are well-behaved even for the coolest stars in the main-sequence, contrary to what has been found in previous works (see Mortier et al 2014;Montes et al 2018;Tsantaki et al 2019;Brucalassi et al 2021). Finally, we compared our V broad values to those of other late-type stars.…”
Section: Stellar Atmospheric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The surface gravities derived with spectroscopic data are sometimes not entirely in agreement with those calculated using evolutionary models, visual magnitudes, and parallaxes (Tsantaki et al 2019;Brucalassi et al 2021). The use of evolutionary models provides us with an alternative method that can be used to assess the precision of the spectroscopic log g values.…”
Section: Trigonometric Gravities Radii and Massesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are a small representation of the statistical studies performed focusing on the potential correlations between the star's proprieties and its hosted planets. Detailed knowledge of the nature of indi-vidual stars is crucial for the thorough understanding of planetary systems currently being characterized by CHEOPS (Benz et al 2021) and ESPRESSO (Pepe et al 2021), and for preparing the selection of targets for future missions such as ARIEL (Tinetti et al 2018;Brucalassi et al 2021), and PLATO (Rauer et al 2014). SWEET-Cat is a catalog with homogeneous spectroscopic parameters for planet hosts, with near-full completeness for the RV detected planets; it was introduced by Santos et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn 2002). Nevertheless, it is common to observe a large dispersion in the values of stellar parameters and abundances when comparing literature results or the performance of different analysis methods applied to the same spectra (Lebzelter et al 2012;Hinkel et al 2014Hinkel et al , 2016Smiljanic et al 2014;Jofré et al 2017;Brucalassi et al 2021). This outcome is a consequence of the complexity of the task.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%