2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.101825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of structural lineaments of Northeastern Laos using the LTHG and EHGA methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Pham et al (2019Pham et al ( , 2022b proved that 2 ≤ α ≤ 10 will produce the best solutions. As shown in Figure 4d, the LTHG can equalize different amplitudes, and provides sharper edges than the TAHG.…”
Section: Edge Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(3) Pham et al (2019Pham et al ( , 2022b proved that 2 ≤ α ≤ 10 will produce the best solutions. As shown in Figure 4d, the LTHG can equalize different amplitudes, and provides sharper edges than the TAHG.…”
Section: Edge Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figures 4c and 4d, the depth of the source bodies has no effect on the TAHG and LTHG, and their peak values are near the true boundaries even for deep bodies. This is one of the benefits of the TAHG and LTHG over the horizontal gradient, which cannot delineate boundaries originating from deep magnetic bodies (Pham et al, 2022b;Eldosouky et al, 2020). The FSED also enhances the boundaries of both deep and shallow bodies and its peak values are near the real boundaries (Fig.…”
Section: Edge Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though these traditional procedures are frequently employed to qualitatively interpret magnetic and gravity data [13,14], they often generate diffuse lineament maps [15][16][17][18]. However, researchers have proposed several other enhancement operations centered on potential field gradients to reduce the difficulties of the traditional edge-detection procedures [18,19]. The tilt derivative method centered on the arctan function of the vertical gradient-to-THG ratio [20], the tilt derivative of gradient amplitude [21], and the THG computed by averaging the vertical gradients [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravity and magnetic data can provide vital information on the subsurface structures (Dung and Minh, 2017;Hang et al, 2019;Eldosouky et al, 2021a;Eldosouky et al, 2021b;Oksum 2021). The determination of geological boundaries from the interpretation of gravity data has been the subject of several studies, and many different techniques have been introduced (Melouah et al, 2021;Eldosouky et al, 2022a;Pham et al, 2022a;Eldosouky et al, 2022b;Pham et al, 2022b;Eldosouky et al, 2022c;Ghomsi et al, 2022c;Eldosouky et al, 2022d;Ghomsi et al, 2022d), such as, for example, the peak detection methods (Blakely and Simpson, 1986;Hang et al, 2017;Pham et al, 2018;Pham et al, 2021), vertical derivatives, the filters of horizontal gradient (Cordell, 1979;Cordell and Grauch, 1985), the analytical signal (Nabighian, 1972;Nabighian, 1984;Roest et al, 1992), tilt angle (Miller and Singh, 1994), the horizontal gradient amplitude of tilt angle (Verduzco et al, 2004), enhanced horizontal gradient amplitude (Pham et al, 2020a), improved logistic function (Pham et al, 2020b), and balanced horizontal gradient amplitude filters (Prasad et al, 2022a;Prasad et al, 2022b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%