2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sub-micromolar amounts of sulfide by standard free anodic stripping voltammetry and anodic stripping voltammetric titration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equations (6) and (8) [19] observed that traditional indirect spectrophotometric methods were subjected to incertitude due to oxidative processes and that, more globally, the main hindrance of these approaches toward sulfide quantification was the lack of selectivity, especially with components such as thiocyanate, dithionite, thiols, sulfites, and thiosulfates. Even if indirect methods may be sensitive and reach sub-micromolar detection levels [68,69], they strongly depend on the chemical background (namely, salinity and reactive species) of the samples and are subjected to strong interferences that require, at least, repeated and adapted calibration procedures. Comparative measurement between our method and conventional methods has been performed on one natural sample from the Dogger Aquifer (Supplementary Data, Section 5).…”
Section: Methods Liabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations (6) and (8) [19] observed that traditional indirect spectrophotometric methods were subjected to incertitude due to oxidative processes and that, more globally, the main hindrance of these approaches toward sulfide quantification was the lack of selectivity, especially with components such as thiocyanate, dithionite, thiols, sulfites, and thiosulfates. Even if indirect methods may be sensitive and reach sub-micromolar detection levels [68,69], they strongly depend on the chemical background (namely, salinity and reactive species) of the samples and are subjected to strong interferences that require, at least, repeated and adapted calibration procedures. Comparative measurement between our method and conventional methods has been performed on one natural sample from the Dogger Aquifer (Supplementary Data, Section 5).…”
Section: Methods Liabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The long-term action of sulfide in low concentrations causes chronic diseases of respiratory tracts, blood, eyes, skin and digestive disturbance. Thus, the high toxicity of sulfide species and reactivity of sulfide species have made their measurement crucial to both analytical and environmental chemists (Titova et al, 2009). A variety of analytical methods for determining sulfides have been reported to data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Excessive exposure to sulfide causes chronic disorders in the respiratory tract, blood, eyes, skin, and digestive system and also causes headaches, vertigo, impaired hearing, and autonomic dysfunction. 21 There are several techniques involving voltametric, 22 chromatographic, 23 potentiometric, 24 electrochemical, 25 fluorometric, 26 and colorimetric 27 methods to detect sulfide ions. Among these, fluorescence technique is considered as the most sensitive and selective technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfide ion is widely found in nature as industrial wastage and as a harmful water pollutant . Excessive exposure to sulfide causes chronic disorders in the respiratory tract, blood, eyes, skin, and digestive system and also causes headaches, vertigo, impaired hearing, and autonomic dysfunction . There are several techniques involving voltametric, chromatographic, potentiometric, electrochemical, fluorometric, and colorimetric methods to detect sulfide ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%