2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sulfachloropyridazine residue levels in feathers from broiler chickens after oral administration using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract: Several antimicrobials are routinely used by the poultry farming industry on their daily operations, however, researchers have found for some antimicrobials that their residues persist for longer periods in feathers than they do in edible tissues, and at higher concentrations, as well. But this information is not known for other classes of antimicrobials, such as the sulfonamides. Therefore, this work presents an accurate and reliable analytical method for the detection of sulfachloropyridazine (SCP) in feathe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Poultry litter is a heterogeneous compound, consisting mainly of poultry droppings, litter material (e.g., wood shavings), dead skin, food debris, water, microbiota, and poultry feathers [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Moreover, concentrations reaching 2947 μg kg −1 of sulfachloropyridazine and oxytetracycline have been detected on poultry feathers, further contributing to the accumulation of AMs in litter [ 13 , 14 ]. Several families of AMs have already been identified in poultry litter in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 152 mg kg −1 [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poultry litter is a heterogeneous compound, consisting mainly of poultry droppings, litter material (e.g., wood shavings), dead skin, food debris, water, microbiota, and poultry feathers [ 10 , 11 , 12 ]. Moreover, concentrations reaching 2947 μg kg −1 of sulfachloropyridazine and oxytetracycline have been detected on poultry feathers, further contributing to the accumulation of AMs in litter [ 13 , 14 ]. Several families of AMs have already been identified in poultry litter in concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 152 mg kg −1 [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, there was a need for matrices in which antibiotics could be detected over a longer time span. For the monitoring of antibiotic use in poultry, the analysis of feathers provided a means to detect antibiotic residues with a long detection window, even after they were excreted fully from muscle and liver (San Martín et al 2007;Cornejo et al 2011b;Berendsen et al 2013;Cornejo et al 2017;Pokrant et al 2018;Církva et al 2019;Maddaleno et al 2019). Using such a noninvasive method, antibiotic use during almost the whole lifespan of a broiler can be monitored, making it possible to better enforce registration of antibiotics use aiming for prudent application (Jansen et al 2016(Jansen et al , 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAs are frequently detected in feather meal, of which the major raw material is poultry feather; sulfamerazine, SMZ, and sulfamethoxazole have been detected at 3.5–173 ng/g concentrations . The concentrations of antimicrobials are higher in feathers than in edible tissues, such as liver and muscle samples. Pokrant et al studied sulfachloropyridazine depletion in feathers from broiler chickens after oral administration. Sulfachloropyridazine persists in feathers for up to 55 days after ceasing treatment, and its concentrations are higher in feathers than in edible tissues .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentrations of antimicrobials are higher in feathers than in edible tissues, such as liver and muscle samples. Pokrant et al studied sulfachloropyridazine depletion in feathers from broiler chickens after oral administration. Sulfachloropyridazine persists in feathers for up to 55 days after ceasing treatment, and its concentrations are higher in feathers than in edible tissues . These findings suggest that SAs monitoring in livestock production based on feather analysis is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%