1998
DOI: 10.1039/a805488f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of sulfadiazine and sulfamethoxazole by capillary electrophoresis with end-column electrochemical detection

Abstract: Capillary electrophoresis (CE) with end-column electrochemical detection (EC) of sulfadiazine (SDZ) and sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) is described. Under the optimum conditions, SDZ and SMZ were separated satisfactorily, and a highly sensitive and stable response was obtained at a potential of 1.1 V versus Ag/AgCl. Optimized end-column detection provides detection limits as low as 0.1 microM for both compounds, which corresponds to 0.024 and 0.021 fmol with peak efficiencies of 394,000 and 335,000 theoretical plates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are only a few reports available on the electrochemical detection of sulfa drugs [16 -24], and in some of them the oxidation/reduction products can be adsorbed strongly on the surface of the electrodes, which thus tend to become fouled and deactivated [16 -18]. For example, You et al [17] observed a rapid decrease in the current response at carbon fiber electrodes during the detection of sulfadiazine and sulfamethoxazole after separating them by capillary electrophoresis; they then pretreated the electrode by potential cycling to regain the response. On the other hand, Preechaworapun et al [24], using a boron-doped diamond electrode (BDD), found no deactivation during the electrochemical detection of other sulfonamides (including sulfadiazine), after separating them by HPLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a few reports available on the electrochemical detection of sulfa drugs [16 -24], and in some of them the oxidation/reduction products can be adsorbed strongly on the surface of the electrodes, which thus tend to become fouled and deactivated [16 -18]. For example, You et al [17] observed a rapid decrease in the current response at carbon fiber electrodes during the detection of sulfadiazine and sulfamethoxazole after separating them by capillary electrophoresis; they then pretreated the electrode by potential cycling to regain the response. On the other hand, Preechaworapun et al [24], using a boron-doped diamond electrode (BDD), found no deactivation during the electrochemical detection of other sulfonamides (including sulfadiazine), after separating them by HPLC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to concern over the analytical determination of sulfa drugs in pharmaceuticals and residues in food products, various methods have been proposed, including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], capillary electrophoresis [11][12][13], and gas chromatography [14][15][16]. These methods have proven to be sensitive and suitable for sulfonamide determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the optimum condition, a low detection limit of 0.1 mM, 0.1 mM was obtained with peak ef®ciencies of 394 000 and 335 000 theoretical plates for SDZ and SMZ, respectively. This method was applied into real sample determination of SDZ and SMZ [102].…”
Section: Carbon Fiber Microelectrodementioning
confidence: 99%