1951
DOI: 10.1038/168271a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the Absolute Configuration of Optically Active Compounds by Means of X-Rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
343
0
18

Year Published

1971
1971
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 769 publications
(366 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
5
343
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, conventional X-ray scattering gives bond distances, but cannot deliver absolute positions of atoms because the path (phase) differences are identical for enantiomers. However, in 1951 Bijvoet and coworkers finally confirmed the FischerRosanoff assignment by determining the absolute configuration of sodium rubidium (þ)-tartrate via anomalous X-ray scattering [31]. Using zirconium Ka wavelength, which is absorbed by rubidium, a phase lag was introduced, which allowed to distinguish ''front-and-back'' positions of atoms.…”
Section: Absolute Configuration and Stereodescriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, conventional X-ray scattering gives bond distances, but cannot deliver absolute positions of atoms because the path (phase) differences are identical for enantiomers. However, in 1951 Bijvoet and coworkers finally confirmed the FischerRosanoff assignment by determining the absolute configuration of sodium rubidium (þ)-tartrate via anomalous X-ray scattering [31]. Using zirconium Ka wavelength, which is absorbed by rubidium, a phase lag was introduced, which allowed to distinguish ''front-and-back'' positions of atoms.…”
Section: Absolute Configuration and Stereodescriptorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All hydrogen atoms, with the exception of those on the methylene and methyl groups, were located from a difference Fourier map and included in the structure factor calculations but their positions were not refined. The absolute configuration of the compound was determined by comparing the calculated and observed differences in the intensities of 15 Friedel pairs (Bijvoet, Peerdeman & van Bommel, 1951), using Cu Ka radiation. The intensity differences for all 15 reflections are in agreement with the configuration shown in the figures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another event which had a major impact was the determination of the absolute hand of the asymmetric carbon atom of sodium tartrate by Bijvoet (Bijvoet, 1949;Bijvoet et al, 1951). By indexing the X-ray re¯ections with a right-handed system, he showed that the breakdown of Friedel's law in the presence of an anomalous scatterer was consistent with the asymmetric carbon atom having a hand in agreement with Fischer's convention.…”
Section: Pre-1912mentioning
confidence: 57%