1987
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4347(87)80031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Determination of the (+)- and (−)-enantiomers of pirprofen in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are due to the loss of the R enantiomer, both by glucuronidation and/or excretion and by inversion to the S antipode (Fournel & Caldwell 1986). This inversion, observed for ibuprofen (Geisslinger et al 1990;Lee et al 1985) and suggested for pirprofen (Jamali 1988;Sioufi et al 1987), can explain the apparent discrepancy between pharmacokinetics parameters and protein binding.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are due to the loss of the R enantiomer, both by glucuronidation and/or excretion and by inversion to the S antipode (Fournel & Caldwell 1986). This inversion, observed for ibuprofen (Geisslinger et al 1990;Lee et al 1985) and suggested for pirprofen (Jamali 1988;Sioufi et al 1987), can explain the apparent discrepancy between pharmacokinetics parameters and protein binding.…”
Section: Pharmacokinetic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Its proportion in the total concentration varies with the ratio between the enantiomers, for example, S<R S<R Jamali et al (1988b) Knadler et al (1989 S=R S>R Jamali et al (1988a); Young et al (1991) Hansen et al (1985; S>R S>R Lee et al (1985) Evans et al (1989) S=R S>R Geisslinger et al (1990) Siebler & Kinawi Tamassia et al (1984) (1989) Hayball et al (1991) S<R S=R Foster et al (1988a) Dubois et al (1993 S=R S=R Foster et al (1988b); Sallustio et al (1988 S > RC S > RC Fournel & Caldwell (1986); Melfin et al Otagiri et al (1989) S>R S>R Sioufi et al (1987) Oravcova et al (1991 Abbreviations: ty, = elimination half-life; AUC = area under the plasma concentration-time curve; UF = ultrafiltration; GF = gel filtration; ED = equilibrium dialysis; HPLC = high performance liquid chromatography; HSA = human serum albumin; NO = not determined.…”
Section: Pharmacological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, the high efficiencies typically achievable with CE facilitate the baseline resolution of enantiomers with very low separation factors e.g., 1.01, which would be either impossible, or extremely difficult using conventional HPLC or GC [6,16]. In addition, while the enantioselectivity of a CSP may be satisfactory, the chemical selectivity may be inadequate, such that structurally similar metabolites coelute with the parent drug peak [23,24]. The separation efficiency of CE, however, can enable the simultaneous separation and resolution of structurally similar metabolites [25].…”
Section: Enantiomeric Resolution By Cementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, significant inversion, 50-80%, occurs for ibuprofen (52,68) (Fig. 2), benoxaprofen (73), fenoprofen (74), and loxaprofen (75), and possibly occurs for pirprofen (76), cicloprofen (77), and for one enantiomer within one species but not necessarily for all species. Thus, for deamination and dealkylation, there is stereoselectivity for the (+)-enantiomers in man but for the (-)-enantiomer for deamination in rabbit and dealkylation in rat and dog.…”
Section: Substrate Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%